Skip to main content

The Nice Guy Fallacy













I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads:

I envy not in any moods
The captive void of noble rage
The linnet born within the cage
That never knew the summer woods.

I envy not the beast that takes
His license in the field of time
Unfetter'd by the sense of crime
To whom a conscience never wakes.

Nor what may call itself as bles't
The heart that never plighted troth
But stagnates in the weeds of sloth
Nor any want-begotten rest.

I hold it true, whate'er befall
I feel it, when I sorrow most
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship.

I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as possible, and therefore as little pain as possible. Today, perhaps, this duck-and-cover approach to life is most salient in our relations with others. There are those of us (notice, "us," because I am included) who would rather appease those around us instead of confront them, even at the cost of allowing an injustice to continue. The reward for this lack of backbone, we feel, is a safety from rejection, isolation, and- ultimately- pain.

In my own experience, however, a man whose first goal is to stay safe at all costs brings upon himself a different form of the very thing he strove to avoid. He will find pain anyway, in a form far more subtle- and I would argue far more debilitating and destructive- than he would have had he chosen to speak his mind. Instead of the pain that comes from confrontation, however, this nice guy's pain comes from disaffection and confusion. He lacks identity because he cannot muster the fortitude required of him to live out his dreams in front of a judgmental world. He asks questions like "Who am I?" because he cannot find the courage in himself to find out on his own.

This must be stopped. I drove to the coast today and back (nine hours of driving gives you time to think), mostly because I'm still trying to see if I'm more than just a "nice guy." What I found out is that I have the potential to be more than a nice guy, but that I haven't mustered enough of the necessary courage to move beyond that point yet.

Shocking to me, however, was what I encountered as the solution. It was with me the whole time. Simply put, we as men must choose to fight for those things we hold most dear, and for those everyday occurrences that scream injustice. There can, of course, be a decent, "good" way to go about this. The point is that we- the frozen ones- will no longer be paralyzed, confused, and bitter. We will, instead, become the men God meant us to be.

Comments

  1. I have finally read this with my full attention and I must say I do not see you as only nice! I see you as truthful, thought provoking, and present. Just know when I say "nice" from now on, it is more about your delivery that you being non-confrontational. I think I will just call you kind :)
    Love, Gina

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Gina. I appreciate that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to