Skip to main content

Fairness

Our history is full of examples of those who refused to accept change (often because it challenged ideas that were very important to them). You may already have studied one of the more famous examples of stubbornness. Early in the 1500's, many Europeans believed that the earth was the center of the universe. Around this earth, they said, moved ten “transparent crystal spheres.” The closest sphere was the moon, the next closest was the sun. The next five spheres held the “five known planets,” while the eighth sphere had the “fixed stars” (the last two spheres were created to accommodate small changes in the locations of stars). After the tenth sphere was heaven, with God and the “souls of the saved,” while the angels made sure the ten spheres moved “in perfect circles.” This idea gave some Christians a place for God, and it put humans at an important central place in the universe.

Starting in 1506, however, Nicolas Copernicus challenged these ideas. For twenty-six years, he developed an old Greek theory that the stars and planets (including the earth) moved around a central sun. It was the sun, he said, not the earth, that was central in the universe. Because this idea challenged the earth-centered (geocentric) principle, and the idea that God was outside the tenth sphere, some stubbornly rejected his views. One man, named Martin Luther, went far enough to call Copernicus a “fool” (“The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside down.”), while the Catholic Church also stated that his theory was false.

The response to another man, named Galileo, was even stronger. After his challenge to the traditional view of the universe, he was “tried for heresy,” “imprisoned,” and even “threatened with torture.” The pressure on Galileo was strong enough that he rejected and cursed his own theory. It was because of the work of people like Copernicus and Galileo, however, that we understand the universe and are better able to explain how gravity works (many times, humans will at first reject an idea, but later will accept it, just like we at first hate a new song we hear on the radio, but later grow to really enjoy it).

The point of this story is this: If you want to be a fair thinker, it is essential that you not reject ideas right away. It’s so easy to say someone is wrong just because you don’t agree with them. Fairness means thinking about why the idea might be right, but also thinking about why the idea might be wrong. Weigh carefully what you hear, therefore, neither rejecting nor easily accepting it. Fairness, like other human traits, is an art form able to be developed with practice. Those who do develop it become more classy in their interactions with others, and those others will truly appreciate you for it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Ghosts

Exercising at a gym seems to be pretty important in our culture, but it's kind of weird to see the social dynamics when you're there. Usually, if you're running an errand, you see others doing the same thing, going about their days and focusing on what's in front of them. The same thing happens at the gym, only everyone is relatively stationary. They don't really go anywhere, except from one machine or area to another. One might think this lends itself to lots of interaction between members, especially since they're all there for the same purpose, but it isn't true. Not only do people generally avoid talking to one another, but they also avoid even looking at one another. It is as though there is no one else there, even though there are dozens on any given day. Most people follow this unwritten rule, unless something in the environment-- say, two people wanting to use the same set of weights-- gives them common ground to interact, or unless they've alr...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...