Skip to main content

Dishonest Scales

Loneliness isn't an easy experience, but it is a universal one. Just as present as the need to endure it, however, is a balance that needs to be kept because of it. On the one hand is the need to be loved, and on the other, the need to be faithful to yourself and the values you know to be right. Whichever side of the scale is heavier at the moment will determine your behavior around (or without) others: if loneliness weighs heavier on your heart, you will be more likely to give more of yourself away, to compromise yourself because your need to feel accepted is more pressing at the moment; and if you're fulfilled by other circumstances in life (in my experience, the fulfillment that comes through work or service, rich relationships, or the need to think about things on your own), you will be more likely to hold to your values and rebuff challenges to them.

There is a pride in one and not the other. It's as though remaining solvent is worth the loneliness. There are two roads to maintaining that pride. One is to face the challenges to your values directly, and the other is to avoid them by avoiding relationships. It is easier to avoid than to find that you're not strong enough to guard your values.

Let me give you a recent example. Like others, I believe in the importance of defending the weak, of standing by the side of the underdog. Twice in the past few days, however, I've seen my inability to meet that standard. Once was on the soccer field, when a group of guys made comments against one of the other players. I made an offhand comment, like "He's doing alright," but that was all. I could have been stronger, defended him more directly; it revealed that I can be so much more interested in protecting myself than in caring about others. In a second instance, I only weakly interjected twice in the situation, once indirectly and the other more directly. I knew I was fulfilling my need to defend without actually doing so, without the actual risk involved. Such self-deception is common to us, I'm sure, but it was more obvious in my experience here.

This, of course, focuses on the problem and not the solution. The solution is to forget yourself for the moment, to put yourself in the other person's shoes and so claim a right to his or her value as a person. If there is a scale of conflict as I see it-- with a desire to be loved on the one side and the need to remain faithful to what you know to be right on the other-- then the goal is to weight the scales so that they tip consistently toward justice for self and others. I get the feeling that practicing this "weighting" process leaves you not so alone, after all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...