Skip to main content

The Leap

In September of 2014, when Gallup asked a sample of Americans whether they trust the federal government to handle international and domestic problems, the number of people who marked "None at all" was at its highest point since May of 1972. Respondents even showed a decreasing tendency to trust themselves.* Such distrust goes back to this country's inception. Richard Hofstadter has shown that the Founders distrusted both a government too democratic and one too authoritarian. He perhaps best summarizes this sentiment with a quote from a clergyman named Jeremy Belknap: "Let it stand as a principal that government originates from the people; but let the people be taught...that they are not able to govern themselves."**

Yet, many of us look to those in authority for security, and as examples of moral integrity. There is, I suppose, a danger in both too much skepticism and too little. For one who tends to trust easily, one danger--the least of them-- lies in a stinging disappointment when he finds fault with the one in authority. Worse, such a man may tolerate gross abuses by this person. This rings true in both the private and public spheres.

I write this in response to my own feelings about authority. I, for one, am more apt to trust that people with power want to do the right thing. Yet, both Christian doctrine and my own experience have taught me that motives are not always pure. Athletes cheat. Politicians extort. Pastors commit adultery. It becomes easy to address such glaring flaws in human authority with a decision to keep a distance. Confine the ones in authority to their roles as leaders, scholars, and scientists. Make them heroes. Ignore their personal lives and, by all means, don't get close. With such a strategy in hand, there will be no need to worry yourself with moral flaws.

Such a perception, of course, cannot last. Whether the truth screams or whispers, it cannot be made mute forever; and the house of cards one builds to manage his own insecurities about the world will be dashed, sometimes violently, and often by the man himself. When this happens, a shift in faith often ensues. Faith in business becomes faith in athletes; faith in the church becomes faith in charitable organizations; faith in parents becomes faith in bosses. When, in its turn, this trust is violated, what comes next is a maturity of sorts, if a man allows it. In whatever new or old authority the man invests himself, it is in the clear understanding that it, too, will fail. The foundation, it must be decided at the start, cannot be left the same. No belief in authority can ultimately rest in man himself.

Jesus knew this. In Matthew 7, he communicated the gravity of our decisions about whom or what we trust, and shows that there is one who is trustworthy:
Everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.
Trust involves action. Consider a scene from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. In a cave containing the Holy Grail, Indy's father is shot. Knowing that the Grail can heal the sick, Indy enters the cave to retrieve it, and eventually approaches a cliff. His guidebook reads, "Only in the leap from the lion's head will he prove his worth." Thus, he is forced to step into the precipice, but when he does so, finds an invisible path there to catch him. His fears relieved, he then walks more confidently across the path. It was the first step that was the riskiest. Just to be safe, however, he threw pebbles across the path behind him so he could see where it was.

We do not always have that luxury. In fact, it is easy for us to forget how God has proven himself to us, so that the faith in God that once moved mountains is so reduced that we can barely get out of bed in the morning. This faith amnesia must be one reason that James exhorts us to continue obeying and following the word of God, “not forgetting what we have heard, but doing it.” Those who do this, James promises, “will be blessed in what they do.”

That there is an eternal Father in whom we can trust may come as unseemly to a nation increasingly unwilling to trust our institutions.*** Yet, this is the only permanent foundation on which we can build our trust, the only one that will not fail. Such trust, like all trust, comes at a cost, of course. We must be willing to obey the one in authority to see that he is trustworthy; once this happens, a man begins to see the firmness of his foundation. "All other ground"-- be it fame, money, achievement, or those in authority-- "is sinking sand."

*"Trust in Government." Gallup, Inc. September 2014. Web. 5 October 2014.
*On domestic problems, seventeen percent of people answered "None at all" for 2011, 2013, and 2014. On international problems, nineteen percent answered "None at all."
**Hofstadter, Richard. "The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism." The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. A.A. Knopf: New York, 1948. Quoted from Clark, Doug. Linn-Benton Community College. Web. October 2014.
***A 2012 Gallup poll ("U.S. Confidence in Organized Religion at Low Point") found that Americans have also lost trust in the church as an institution. While in 1973, 66 percent of respondents held "a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of trust in the church as an institution, only 44 percent said so in 2012.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...