Skip to main content

Thoughts on "A Poison Tree" (William Blake)

   These are my thoughts on William Blake's "A Poison Tree."

   "A Poison Tree" (William Blake)
   I was angry with my friend; 
   I told my wrath, my wrath did end. 
   I was angry with my foe: 
   I told it not, my wrath did grow. 

   And I water'd it in fears, 
   Night & morning with my tears: 
   And I sunned it with smiles, 
   And with soft deceitful wiles. 

   And it grew both day and night. 
   Till it bore an apple bright. 
   And my foe beheld it shine, 
   And he knew that it was mine. 

   And into my garden stole, 
   When the night had veil'd the pole; 
   In the morning glad I see; 
   My foe outstretched beneath the tree.​


The speaker uses the word anger twice in the first stanza, and uses the word wrath, a stronger synonym for anger. In the first stanza, he is angry with his friend and with his enemy, but he tells his friend about the anger and the anger subsides. In contrast, the speaker does not talk to his enemy about his anger, and his anger increases. Blake writes of the speaker's anger with his friend, "I told my wrath, my wrath did end," but that of his foe, "I told it not, my wrath did grow." The speaker then uses the rest of the poem to discuss the consequences of remaining angry with his enemy. The speaker seems to nurture the anger in his fear and sadness (or anger) by the words "water'd it in fears, Night and morning with my tears;" but also in his "smiles, And with soft deceitful wiles." These smiles and deceitful wiles could be smiles to himself, to his foe, or to another person. The anger grows further. In the third stanza, the speaker says that "it grew both day and night Till it bore an apple bright." Then, in the fourth stanza, his anger comes to a conclusion when the speaker is glad at his enemy's demise. The speaker says, "In the morning glad I see/My foe outstretched beneath the tree."

Blake communicates the consequence of retaining your anger at an enemy: the anger grows until the enemy can see it, and can lead to your enemy's demise, with you satisfied at the outcome. Blake does not state directly that the speaker killed the enemy, but it is clear that the speaker is happy that the enemy is dead: "In the morning glad I see/My foe outstretched beneath the tree." The garden must be the same source of his anger, because he describes the anger as bearing an apple, a fruit you would find inside a garden. The enemy is in the place of the speaker's anger. Whether that means the enemy is actually dead, or only dead in the mind of the speaker is unclear, but either way, the anger leads to satisfaction at a horrible end for his enemy. In stanza one, the speaker begins by speaking of a withholding of his anger: he does not say to his enemy that he is angry. In stanza two, he coaxes the anger, perhaps as a result of not telling his enemy that he is angry (in contrast to his telling his friend that he was angry and seeing his anger end). In stanza three, the anger grows into an apple, which the enemy sees. In this stanza, then, Blake shows that anger can become visible as something attractive to one's enemy: the "apple bright." Finally, in stanza four, the speaker implies that the enemy ate this apple and died as a result. The speaker is angry, but does not tell his enemy that he is angry (stanza 1), nurtures the anger as a result (stanza 2), watches his anger grow into something that seems beautiful in appearance (stanza 3), and sees the consequences of that deception with his enemy's death (stanza 4).


There is an allusion, too, to the Garden of Eden here. Just as the speaker nurtures his anger with "soft deceitful wiles," so Satan nurtured the sin in Adam and Eve with his deceit about God's words. Just as the fruit in the garden (often thought of as an apple, though not necessarily an apple) represented sin and seemed "good to eat" to Adam and Eve, so the speaker's sin looked attractive to his enemy. Finally, just as Adam and Even dies as a result of eating the fruit from the forbidden tree, so the speaker's enemy dies from eating the apple.

​The poem reveals that the foe is still in contact with (or at least still thinking about) the speaker. The speaker says that the foe "knew that it was mine." The "it" in the poem is the apple. We also know that the foe seems to have died as a result of indulging the anger: "And into my garden stole/When the night had veil'd the pole/In the morning glad I see/My foe outstretched beneath the tree." The is susceptible to temptation. He also acts secretly, not going to the speaker directly, but secretly "entering" the speaker's garden and indulging the anger of the speaker, then dying. We do not know who the enemy is, or whether the enemy is in the right or in the wrong. The enemy may not have done anything wrong. We also do not know whether the speaker's gender or age.

In the end, this poem reveals anger--or all sin--as something specific to one man, but something that all men experience. Too, the consequences of that anger or sin, Blake shows, affect not only us, but those against whom we use it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pleasure

*Note: In the following post, I am heavily influenced by a pastor named Bob Shirock. Specifically, Shirock writes about Solomon's response to the pleasures he experienced in life in Ecclesiastes, and observes that we can enjoy pleasures in life if we accept them as God's gifts, and if we express our gratitude in their enjoyment. He cites Ecclesiastes 2:24-26 and 1 Timothy 4:1-5. I’ve noticed something about pleasure: the highs can be followed by lows. This sounds obvious, but what I mean is that times of joy and fun in life's pleasures are wonderful, and can lift your spirits for a time, but they can be followed by a disappointment that comes from the realization that they are short-lived and will not satisfy us in the long-term. I’m calling this a pleasure hangover. We gain happiness for a time, but see that this happiness is temporary. We therefore feel a subsequent low that leaves us still longing. It reminds me of a theme in the life of C.S. Lewis: sehnsucht , or a wist...

Ghosts

Exercising at a gym seems to be pretty important in our culture, but it's kind of weird to see the social dynamics when you're there. Usually, if you're running an errand, you see others doing the same thing, going about their days and focusing on what's in front of them. The same thing happens at the gym, only everyone is relatively stationary. They don't really go anywhere, except from one machine or area to another. One might think this lends itself to lots of interaction between members, especially since they're all there for the same purpose, but it isn't true. Not only do people generally avoid talking to one another, but they also avoid even looking at one another. It is as though there is no one else there, even though there are dozens on any given day. Most people follow this unwritten rule, unless something in the environment-- say, two people wanting to use the same set of weights-- gives them common ground to interact, or unless they've alr...

End of an Era

It was over two years ago that I joined an experiment that would last until last July, an experiment that would significantly change me and the eleven others involved. That experiment was the creation of a new church comprised of twelve members whose purpose was to serve the people of downtown Stockton. Most attractive to me about it was that half of our income would be used in some way outside the church, to benefit the local community or to aid in international assistance. In that span of time, we did in fact serve in ways we'd envisioned. One of our first events was a pizza and school supplies giveaway (coupled with games for the kids who came) toward the end of our first summer. Many of those who came seemed genuinely happy at this. Through that year, we also hosted an event called a "card me house party," wherein each person's ticket to the event was a gift card. Once inside, chips could be purchased to play card and other games, with the resulting collection g...