Skip to main content

Love

Most of us at one point or another have heard that love is not as much a feeling as it is an action or a choice. Although this must be true for anyone to possibly love those different from us, it doesn’t really reveal how we are supposed to make that choice. What I’m learning is that loving others means learning God’s perspective of ourselves and of others. I say learning, instead of, say, adopting, because ultimately we aren’t the ones in control of that perspective. It’s not our own perspective, it’s God’s. He has to teach it to us. Our role is to be willing to learn it. I think it’s very natural for us to be protective about our ideological space, to cut ourselves off from certain types of people because they threaten our beliefs or morals. When our perspectives shift, though, from one that sees people as a threat or a bother, to one that sees them as people with real fears and needs, our treatment of them begins to change. We become willing to drop our guards, to listen. There’s a cool four-line poem by Elizabeth Barrett Browning that I think helps illustrate this perspective (which I've quoted before). She says these words:

“Earth’s crammed with heaven,
And every common bush afire with God;
But only he who sees takes off his shoes;
The rest sit round it and pluck blackberries.”

These words echo a sense of awe that we get from truly knowing the significance of God’s creation, including people. I know only that I need more of that realization, and though I've only seen glimpses now and then, it's hopeful to know that God can do so much good through the person willing to look away from himself for a moment to peer into the lives of the hurting. It's with that spirit of selflessness that Christ changed the world. Work with what you have. That's all God expects. Thanks for reading.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...
2 comments
Read more