Skip to main content

Fairness

Our history is full of examples of those who refused to accept change (often because it challenged ideas that were very important to them). You may already have studied one of the more famous examples of stubbornness. Early in the 1500's, many Europeans believed that the earth was the center of the universe. Around this earth, they said, moved ten “transparent crystal spheres.” The closest sphere was the moon, the next closest was the sun. The next five spheres held the “five known planets,” while the eighth sphere had the “fixed stars” (the last two spheres were created to accommodate small changes in the locations of stars). After the tenth sphere was heaven, with God and the “souls of the saved,” while the angels made sure the ten spheres moved “in perfect circles.” This idea gave some Christians a place for God, and it put humans at an important central place in the universe.

Starting in 1506, however, Nicolas Copernicus challenged these ideas. For twenty-six years, he developed an old Greek theory that the stars and planets (including the earth) moved around a central sun. It was the sun, he said, not the earth, that was central in the universe. Because this idea challenged the earth-centered (geocentric) principle, and the idea that God was outside the tenth sphere, some stubbornly rejected his views. One man, named Martin Luther, went far enough to call Copernicus a “fool” (“The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside down.”), while the Catholic Church also stated that his theory was false.

The response to another man, named Galileo, was even stronger. After his challenge to the traditional view of the universe, he was “tried for heresy,” “imprisoned,” and even “threatened with torture.” The pressure on Galileo was strong enough that he rejected and cursed his own theory. It was because of the work of people like Copernicus and Galileo, however, that we understand the universe and are better able to explain how gravity works (many times, humans will at first reject an idea, but later will accept it, just like we at first hate a new song we hear on the radio, but later grow to really enjoy it).

The point of this story is this: If you want to be a fair thinker, it is essential that you not reject ideas right away. It’s so easy to say someone is wrong just because you don’t agree with them. Fairness means thinking about why the idea might be right, but also thinking about why the idea might be wrong. Weigh carefully what you hear, therefore, neither rejecting nor easily accepting it. Fairness, like other human traits, is an art form able to be developed with practice. Those who do develop it become more classy in their interactions with others, and those others will truly appreciate you for it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...