Skip to main content

The Displaced

If you were asked which country has produced the most refugees (those forced to move from their own country to another), your first thought might be one in Africa. It's not a bad guess. Three of the top ten countries whose people have moved to another country are from Africa (Somalia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Sudan). Still, as of 2009 one country has overwhelmingly produced the most refugees, with over one million more refugees than the next highest: Afghanistan. Here is a list of the top ten countries of origin (the complete list can be found at http://www.unhcr.org/4c11f0be9.html).

1. Afghanistan: 2.887 million
2. Iraq: 1.785 million
3. Somalia: 678,400
4. Democratic Rep. of the Congo: 455,852
5. Myanmar: 406,669
6. Columbia: 389,752
7. Sudan: 368,195
8. Vietnam: 339,289
9. Serbia: 195,626
10. Turkey: 146,387

Afghanistan, unfortunately, is landlocked, war-torn, and dependent on foreign help. Its economy has improved recently due to the return of its agriculture and service sectors, but it is still dependent on other countries.* Sudan, on the other hand, has improved recently, with many citizens repatriated to the south. In fact, that country may finally see some good news: South Sudan will likely become the world's newest country on July 9th of this year.

All this is simply to highlight one of the great needs of our world. I'm going to use some of this information in my classroom this week. One of my hopes, as a teacher, is to "light a fire," as W.B. Yeats said; to ignite a passion in my students; to give them an opportunity to reach their potential by meeting the challenges of a broken world. I believe that one day this world will be changed; but until then, I want to be apart of God's work in making it whole.

*Source: CIA World Factbook, Afghanistan

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as