Skip to main content

Resistance

Among the things that make someone reliable is an ability to remain steadfast in your beliefs and your actions, even in the face of fierce resistance. One man who did that was Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Bonhoeffer was executed at age 39 in a concentration camp after having resisted the Nazi regime’s elevation of Hitler and its racism against Jews. His was among the few voices speaking and acting out against a largely popular Nazi government. After the Nazis created a set of laws (the Nuremberg laws) that officially recognized the Jews as “subjects” instead of citizens, Bonhoeffer resisted by joining a secret military intelligence organization whose goal was to undermine the Nazis; and by helping to smuggle fourteen Jews out of Germany.

Although they were aware of his tendency to speak against them, the Nazis didn’t know how far he would go to stop them. He was aware of different plots on Hitler’s life, and believed it was fully necessary to assassinate the Fuhrer. This is what made Bonhoeffer so unique: Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a pastor. It was virtually unprecedented for a theologian to advocate assassinating (or even actively resisting) their leader in Germany, but Bonhoeffer did. Even among his friends, he felt somewhat alone in this belief, but he never wavered from it. This is what made him reliable: he maintained his stance even when he felt alone in it. It was because of that stance that Bonhoeffer was eventually killed. Already under arrest for helping to smuggle Jews out of the country, Bonhoeffer was sent to a concentration camp (Flossenburg), where he was hanged not long before the Nazis were defeated in World War II.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...