Skip to main content

Resistance

Among the things that make someone reliable is an ability to remain steadfast in your beliefs and your actions, even in the face of fierce resistance. One man who did that was Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Bonhoeffer was executed at age 39 in a concentration camp after having resisted the Nazi regime’s elevation of Hitler and its racism against Jews. His was among the few voices speaking and acting out against a largely popular Nazi government. After the Nazis created a set of laws (the Nuremberg laws) that officially recognized the Jews as “subjects” instead of citizens, Bonhoeffer resisted by joining a secret military intelligence organization whose goal was to undermine the Nazis; and by helping to smuggle fourteen Jews out of Germany.

Although they were aware of his tendency to speak against them, the Nazis didn’t know how far he would go to stop them. He was aware of different plots on Hitler’s life, and believed it was fully necessary to assassinate the Fuhrer. This is what made Bonhoeffer so unique: Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a pastor. It was virtually unprecedented for a theologian to advocate assassinating (or even actively resisting) their leader in Germany, but Bonhoeffer did. Even among his friends, he felt somewhat alone in this belief, but he never wavered from it. This is what made him reliable: he maintained his stance even when he felt alone in it. It was because of that stance that Bonhoeffer was eventually killed. Already under arrest for helping to smuggle Jews out of the country, Bonhoeffer was sent to a concentration camp (Flossenburg), where he was hanged not long before the Nazis were defeated in World War II.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as
2 comments
Read more