Skip to main content

Dishonest Scales

Loneliness isn't an easy experience, but it is a universal one. Just as present as the need to endure it, however, is a balance that needs to be kept because of it. On the one hand is the need to be loved, and on the other, the need to be faithful to yourself and the values you know to be right. Whichever side of the scale is heavier at the moment will determine your behavior around (or without) others: if loneliness weighs heavier on your heart, you will be more likely to give more of yourself away, to compromise yourself because your need to feel accepted is more pressing at the moment; and if you're fulfilled by other circumstances in life (in my experience, the fulfillment that comes through work or service, rich relationships, or the need to think about things on your own), you will be more likely to hold to your values and rebuff challenges to them.

There is a pride in one and not the other. It's as though remaining solvent is worth the loneliness. There are two roads to maintaining that pride. One is to face the challenges to your values directly, and the other is to avoid them by avoiding relationships. It is easier to avoid than to find that you're not strong enough to guard your values.

Let me give you a recent example. Like others, I believe in the importance of defending the weak, of standing by the side of the underdog. Twice in the past few days, however, I've seen my inability to meet that standard. Once was on the soccer field, when a group of guys made comments against one of the other players. I made an offhand comment, like "He's doing alright," but that was all. I could have been stronger, defended him more directly; it revealed that I can be so much more interested in protecting myself than in caring about others. In a second instance, I only weakly interjected twice in the situation, once indirectly and the other more directly. I knew I was fulfilling my need to defend without actually doing so, without the actual risk involved. Such self-deception is common to us, I'm sure, but it was more obvious in my experience here.

This, of course, focuses on the problem and not the solution. The solution is to forget yourself for the moment, to put yourself in the other person's shoes and so claim a right to his or her value as a person. If there is a scale of conflict as I see it-- with a desire to be loved on the one side and the need to remain faithful to what you know to be right on the other-- then the goal is to weight the scales so that they tip consistently toward justice for self and others. I get the feeling that practicing this "weighting" process leaves you not so alone, after all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Ghosts

Exercising at a gym seems to be pretty important in our culture, but it's kind of weird to see the social dynamics when you're there. Usually, if you're running an errand, you see others doing the same thing, going about their days and focusing on what's in front of them. The same thing happens at the gym, only everyone is relatively stationary. They don't really go anywhere, except from one machine or area to another. One might think this lends itself to lots of interaction between members, especially since they're all there for the same purpose, but it isn't true. Not only do people generally avoid talking to one another, but they also avoid even looking at one another. It is as though there is no one else there, even though there are dozens on any given day. Most people follow this unwritten rule, unless something in the environment-- say, two people wanting to use the same set of weights-- gives them common ground to interact, or unless they've alr...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...