Skip to main content

Dishonest Scales

Loneliness isn't an easy experience, but it is a universal one. Just as present as the need to endure it, however, is a balance that needs to be kept because of it. On the one hand is the need to be loved, and on the other, the need to be faithful to yourself and the values you know to be right. Whichever side of the scale is heavier at the moment will determine your behavior around (or without) others: if loneliness weighs heavier on your heart, you will be more likely to give more of yourself away, to compromise yourself because your need to feel accepted is more pressing at the moment; and if you're fulfilled by other circumstances in life (in my experience, the fulfillment that comes through work or service, rich relationships, or the need to think about things on your own), you will be more likely to hold to your values and rebuff challenges to them.

There is a pride in one and not the other. It's as though remaining solvent is worth the loneliness. There are two roads to maintaining that pride. One is to face the challenges to your values directly, and the other is to avoid them by avoiding relationships. It is easier to avoid than to find that you're not strong enough to guard your values.

Let me give you a recent example. Like others, I believe in the importance of defending the weak, of standing by the side of the underdog. Twice in the past few days, however, I've seen my inability to meet that standard. Once was on the soccer field, when a group of guys made comments against one of the other players. I made an offhand comment, like "He's doing alright," but that was all. I could have been stronger, defended him more directly; it revealed that I can be so much more interested in protecting myself than in caring about others. In a second instance, I only weakly interjected twice in the situation, once indirectly and the other more directly. I knew I was fulfilling my need to defend without actually doing so, without the actual risk involved. Such self-deception is common to us, I'm sure, but it was more obvious in my experience here.

This, of course, focuses on the problem and not the solution. The solution is to forget yourself for the moment, to put yourself in the other person's shoes and so claim a right to his or her value as a person. If there is a scale of conflict as I see it-- with a desire to be loved on the one side and the need to remain faithful to what you know to be right on the other-- then the goal is to weight the scales so that they tip consistently toward justice for self and others. I get the feeling that practicing this "weighting" process leaves you not so alone, after all.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...
2 comments
Read more