Skip to main content

The Enlightenment

The eighteenth-century Enlightenment was an intellectual movement centered in France, but reaching into countries around the world. Historians differ on whether the Enlightenment came mainly through elite intellectuals known as philosophes (men like Voltaire, Denis Diderot, Montesquieu, and the baron d'Holbach), or whether the movement occurred through broader social changes in Europe. Whether narrow or broad, however, Enlightenment ideals represented a very visible secular shift in the western world. Among the themes of the movement in France were a clear disdain for secular and church authority (particularly absolutist government and the Catholic Church); boundless optimism that science and the human mind could bring about incredible social progress, and even perfection; and the promotion of religious and social tolerance. Traditionally, the Enlightenment is said to have had its climax in the French Revolution.

The effects of the Enlightenment did not end with this revolution, however. Although the loss of human life in World War I wrought by technological advance led thinkers to criticize heavily the Enlightenment belief in human progress, that belief not only still existed, but could have profound implications for everyday life. In the United States (after the American War for Independence), this was perhaps most visible in what is called the early twentieth-century progressive movement. Here, a variety of mostly middle-class Americans responded to widespread national changes with social and political campaigns ranging from forest conservation to women’s suffrage. Improvements in medicine led to treatment of diseases and physical deformities, and associations were formed to annihilate tuberculosis, cancer, and other maladies. These associations included the American Social Hygiene Association, whose goal was to wipe out sexual disease and who felt that science could eradicate “social” diseases. Though progressives could come from different political parties, all shared a common belief that science could be used to solve social problems; and while some believed scientific methods could lead to greater personal autonomy, others wanted the state to force people to comply with policies meant to benefit the general public. Unfortunately, these policies could include forced sterilization and even euthanasia.

Although two world wars have tempered the belief that society can reach Montesquieu's perfect society, our faith in science today remains unflagging. We do, in fact, have good reason to remain optimistic, with advances in medicine and other areas (the first successful transplant of an artificial windpipe using the patient's own stem cells was reported just last month, for example). I wonder, however, how much damage this same Enlightenment did to the Christian faith with the hatred of what was called "superstition." Enlightenment thinkers in fact assaulted not faith itself, per se, but organized religion. I don't know, however, that this assault did not influence social attitudes toward faith.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...