Skip to main content

The Enlightenment

The eighteenth-century Enlightenment was an intellectual movement centered in France, but reaching into countries around the world. Historians differ on whether the Enlightenment came mainly through elite intellectuals known as philosophes (men like Voltaire, Denis Diderot, Montesquieu, and the baron d'Holbach), or whether the movement occurred through broader social changes in Europe. Whether narrow or broad, however, Enlightenment ideals represented a very visible secular shift in the western world. Among the themes of the movement in France were a clear disdain for secular and church authority (particularly absolutist government and the Catholic Church); boundless optimism that science and the human mind could bring about incredible social progress, and even perfection; and the promotion of religious and social tolerance. Traditionally, the Enlightenment is said to have had its climax in the French Revolution.

The effects of the Enlightenment did not end with this revolution, however. Although the loss of human life in World War I wrought by technological advance led thinkers to criticize heavily the Enlightenment belief in human progress, that belief not only still existed, but could have profound implications for everyday life. In the United States (after the American War for Independence), this was perhaps most visible in what is called the early twentieth-century progressive movement. Here, a variety of mostly middle-class Americans responded to widespread national changes with social and political campaigns ranging from forest conservation to women’s suffrage. Improvements in medicine led to treatment of diseases and physical deformities, and associations were formed to annihilate tuberculosis, cancer, and other maladies. These associations included the American Social Hygiene Association, whose goal was to wipe out sexual disease and who felt that science could eradicate “social” diseases. Though progressives could come from different political parties, all shared a common belief that science could be used to solve social problems; and while some believed scientific methods could lead to greater personal autonomy, others wanted the state to force people to comply with policies meant to benefit the general public. Unfortunately, these policies could include forced sterilization and even euthanasia.

Although two world wars have tempered the belief that society can reach Montesquieu's perfect society, our faith in science today remains unflagging. We do, in fact, have good reason to remain optimistic, with advances in medicine and other areas (the first successful transplant of an artificial windpipe using the patient's own stem cells was reported just last month, for example). I wonder, however, how much damage this same Enlightenment did to the Christian faith with the hatred of what was called "superstition." Enlightenment thinkers in fact assaulted not faith itself, per se, but organized religion. I don't know, however, that this assault did not influence social attitudes toward faith.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Soul and Spirit

As a friend told me about a conversation she had with one of our pastors about whether animals go to heaven, she told me about the Hebrew word nephesh ("soul"). I wondered, then, what the difference was between soul and spirit. After a little research, I came across what many seem to agree is a main difference. The soul of a person is that person's being--personality and life--while the spirit is that part of us that connects with God. There are several verses that refer to spirit in this way:* "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14) "But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ." (1 Corinthians 3:1) "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly p...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...