Skip to main content

Liberation Theology and Hermeneutics

I haven't really done much reading in theology, but a friend lent me a book on liberation theology, a theology which had its source in Latin America and stresses liberation of the oppressed (most importantly, but not exclusively, the economically poor). Especially because liberal theologians emphasize class conflict as a cause of poverty, and because they believe revolution to be the solution to that poverty, observers have interpreted it as Marxist. Liberal theologians themselves see the relationship to Marxism, but believe the "poor" to be broader in scope than Marx's proletariat. Marx's proletariat is a group of wage workers who do not own the means of production and who sell their labor to live. Liberal theologians would include the unemployed and underemployed as those needing liberation; and they also consider racial, ethnic, and gender oppression, albeit as secondary to economic oppression.

Liberal theologians' emphasis on liberating the oppressed is Biblical, as seen in verses like Isaiah 58:66, Jeremiah 22:3, and (in relation to kings) Proverbs 31:8. I know, however, that Christ's purpose was broader than the economic oppression highlighted by liberal theologians. His liberation is centrally a spiritual one, from the bondage of sin and condemnation (John 8:34-36, Romans 6:17-22, Colossians 1:22, and Hebrews 2:14-15, for example).

In line with liberal theologians' central purpose is their method of interpreting scripture. Look at the following words from my friend's book:
"Liberative hermeneutics seeks to discover and activate the transforming energy of biblical texts [emphasis theirs]. In the end, this is a question of finding an interpretation that will lead to individual change (conversion) and change in history (revolution)."*
Because liberating the poor is central to liberation theology, it is understandable that liberal theologians would search specifically for scripture that fits liberating the poor. Approaching scripture in this way, however, at best minimizes the grander message of the Bible, and at worst ignores it. It seems its proponents reduce as secondary Christ's purpose in coming and dying: to "give his life as a ransom for many" (Matthew 20:28). Liberal theologians' efforts are crucial, then, but perhaps minimize the importance of spiritual freedom offered in Christ.

*Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff. Introducing Liberation Theology. Wellwood, UK: Burns & Oats/Search Press Ltd, 1987.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pleasure

*Note: In the following post, I am heavily influenced by a pastor named Bob Shirock. Specifically, Shirock writes about Solomon's response to the pleasures he experienced in life in Ecclesiastes, and observes that we can enjoy pleasures in life if we accept them as God's gifts, and if we express our gratitude in their enjoyment. He cites Ecclesiastes 2:24-26 and 1 Timothy 4:1-5. I’ve noticed something about pleasure: the highs can be followed by lows. This sounds obvious, but what I mean is that times of joy and fun in life's pleasures are wonderful, and can lift your spirits for a time, but they can be followed by a disappointment that comes from the realization that they are short-lived and will not satisfy us in the long-term. I’m calling this a pleasure hangover. We gain happiness for a time, but see that this happiness is temporary. We therefore feel a subsequent low that leaves us still longing. It reminds me of a theme in the life of C.S. Lewis: sehnsucht , or a wist...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ghosts

Exercising at a gym seems to be pretty important in our culture, but it's kind of weird to see the social dynamics when you're there. Usually, if you're running an errand, you see others doing the same thing, going about their days and focusing on what's in front of them. The same thing happens at the gym, only everyone is relatively stationary. They don't really go anywhere, except from one machine or area to another. One might think this lends itself to lots of interaction between members, especially since they're all there for the same purpose, but it isn't true. Not only do people generally avoid talking to one another, but they also avoid even looking at one another. It is as though there is no one else there, even though there are dozens on any given day. Most people follow this unwritten rule, unless something in the environment-- say, two people wanting to use the same set of weights-- gives them common ground to interact, or unless they've alr...
2 comments
Read more

End of an Era

It was over two years ago that I joined an experiment that would last until last July, an experiment that would significantly change me and the eleven others involved. That experiment was the creation of a new church comprised of twelve members whose purpose was to serve the people of downtown Stockton. Most attractive to me about it was that half of our income would be used in some way outside the church, to benefit the local community or to aid in international assistance. In that span of time, we did in fact serve in ways we'd envisioned. One of our first events was a pizza and school supplies giveaway (coupled with games for the kids who came) toward the end of our first summer. Many of those who came seemed genuinely happy at this. Through that year, we also hosted an event called a "card me house party," wherein each person's ticket to the event was a gift card. Once inside, chips could be purchased to play card and other games, with the resulting collection g...
1 comment
Read more