Skip to main content

Liberation Theology and Hermeneutics

I haven't really done much reading in theology, but a friend lent me a book on liberation theology, a theology which had its source in Latin America and stresses liberation of the oppressed (most importantly, but not exclusively, the economically poor). Especially because liberal theologians emphasize class conflict as a cause of poverty, and because they believe revolution to be the solution to that poverty, observers have interpreted it as Marxist. Liberal theologians themselves see the relationship to Marxism, but believe the "poor" to be broader in scope than Marx's proletariat. Marx's proletariat is a group of wage workers who do not own the means of production and who sell their labor to live. Liberal theologians would include the unemployed and underemployed as those needing liberation; and they also consider racial, ethnic, and gender oppression, albeit as secondary to economic oppression.

Liberal theologians' emphasis on liberating the oppressed is Biblical, as seen in verses like Isaiah 58:66, Jeremiah 22:3, and (in relation to kings) Proverbs 31:8. I know, however, that Christ's purpose was broader than the economic oppression highlighted by liberal theologians. His liberation is centrally a spiritual one, from the bondage of sin and condemnation (John 8:34-36, Romans 6:17-22, Colossians 1:22, and Hebrews 2:14-15, for example).

In line with liberal theologians' central purpose is their method of interpreting scripture. Look at the following words from my friend's book:
"Liberative hermeneutics seeks to discover and activate the transforming energy of biblical texts [emphasis theirs]. In the end, this is a question of finding an interpretation that will lead to individual change (conversion) and change in history (revolution)."*
Because liberating the poor is central to liberation theology, it is understandable that liberal theologians would search specifically for scripture that fits liberating the poor. Approaching scripture in this way, however, at best minimizes the grander message of the Bible, and at worst ignores it. It seems its proponents reduce as secondary Christ's purpose in coming and dying: to "give his life as a ransom for many" (Matthew 20:28). Liberal theologians' efforts are crucial, then, but perhaps minimize the importance of spiritual freedom offered in Christ.

*Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff. Introducing Liberation Theology. Wellwood, UK: Burns & Oats/Search Press Ltd, 1987.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ghosts

Exercising at a gym seems to be pretty important in our culture, but it's kind of weird to see the social dynamics when you're there. Usually, if you're running an errand, you see others doing the same thing, going about their days and focusing on what's in front of them. The same thing happens at the gym, only everyone is relatively stationary. They don't really go anywhere, except from one machine or area to another. One might think this lends itself to lots of interaction between members, especially since they're all there for the same purpose, but it isn't true. Not only do people generally avoid talking to one another, but they also avoid even looking at one another. It is as though there is no one else there, even though there are dozens on any given day. Most people follow this unwritten rule, unless something in the environment-- say, two people wanting to use the same set of weights-- gives them common ground to interact, or unless they've alr...
2 comments
Read more

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more