Skip to main content

Liberation Theology and Hermeneutics

I haven't really done much reading in theology, but a friend lent me a book on liberation theology, a theology which had its source in Latin America and stresses liberation of the oppressed (most importantly, but not exclusively, the economically poor). Especially because liberal theologians emphasize class conflict as a cause of poverty, and because they believe revolution to be the solution to that poverty, observers have interpreted it as Marxist. Liberal theologians themselves see the relationship to Marxism, but believe the "poor" to be broader in scope than Marx's proletariat. Marx's proletariat is a group of wage workers who do not own the means of production and who sell their labor to live. Liberal theologians would include the unemployed and underemployed as those needing liberation; and they also consider racial, ethnic, and gender oppression, albeit as secondary to economic oppression.

Liberal theologians' emphasis on liberating the oppressed is Biblical, as seen in verses like Isaiah 58:66, Jeremiah 22:3, and (in relation to kings) Proverbs 31:8. I know, however, that Christ's purpose was broader than the economic oppression highlighted by liberal theologians. His liberation is centrally a spiritual one, from the bondage of sin and condemnation (John 8:34-36, Romans 6:17-22, Colossians 1:22, and Hebrews 2:14-15, for example).

In line with liberal theologians' central purpose is their method of interpreting scripture. Look at the following words from my friend's book:
"Liberative hermeneutics seeks to discover and activate the transforming energy of biblical texts [emphasis theirs]. In the end, this is a question of finding an interpretation that will lead to individual change (conversion) and change in history (revolution)."*
Because liberating the poor is central to liberation theology, it is understandable that liberal theologians would search specifically for scripture that fits liberating the poor. Approaching scripture in this way, however, at best minimizes the grander message of the Bible, and at worst ignores it. It seems its proponents reduce as secondary Christ's purpose in coming and dying: to "give his life as a ransom for many" (Matthew 20:28). Liberal theologians' efforts are crucial, then, but perhaps minimize the importance of spiritual freedom offered in Christ.

*Boff, Leonardo and Clodovis Boff. Introducing Liberation Theology. Wellwood, UK: Burns & Oats/Search Press Ltd, 1987.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.
Post a Comment
Read more

Soul and Spirit

As a friend told me about a conversation she had with one of our pastors about whether animals go to heaven, she told me about the Hebrew word nephesh ("soul"). I wondered, then, what the difference was between soul and spirit. After a little research, I came across what many seem to agree is a main difference. The soul of a person is that person's being--personality and life--while the spirit is that part of us that connects with God. There are several verses that refer to spirit in this way:* "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14) "But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ." (1 Corinthians 3:1) "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...
Post a Comment
Read more