Skip to main content

South Sudan

In under three hours, South Sudan will become the newest country on Earth. Its prospects are both hopeful and dismal. Now independent, the South can ostensibly control a key resource found within its borders: oil. Both sides' desire to control this resource-- discovered in the late 1970s and early 1980s-- has exacerbated a civil war that ended finally in 2005, a civil war that stood as the longest of the twentieth century.

One of the reasons for the ongoing conflict, among a myriad of others, is Southerners' anger at Northern efforts to control their identity: for example, in 1983, President Jafar Nimeiri enacted what are called the September Laws, which applied sharia (Muslim religious) law to the whole of Sudan. These laws included the hudud, a group of harsh criminal punishments that include execution and amputation. This is part of what Ann Mosely Lesch contends is a Northern effort to force a common identity on a diverse population (something she calls the "control model" of government), instead of including the different ethnic and religious groups in government (what she calls the "ethnic plurlist model").*

Khartoum (Sudan's capital) was the first to recognize the independence of South Sudan, but recognition does not translate into an end to conflict. Fighting still takes place in Darfur and along the north-south border, a border whose boundaries remain ambiguous; and while the South owns oil-rich land, it can only export oil to Port Sudan through a pipeline that travels through the North. Khartoum has already threatened to block passage of the oil if the South doesn't pay enough of the revenue, and the South has responded by saying it will live off of credit, with oil as collateral.**

Still, there is a sense of optimism in the Sudan as independence occurs, an optimism that is the more deeply felt in a part of Sudan that has not just been ignored, but which has been purposely handicapped in its ability to educate its people and govern its country.*** Landlocked, underdeveloped, and poor, South Sudan will face serious economic and political challenges, but for the time, at least, its people will celebrate their new found freedom. One hopes, however, that this freedom will strengthen not just hearts, but the material circumstances of Southern lives as well.

*Ann Mosely Lesch. The Sudan: Contested National Identities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998.
**Heavens, Andrew and Alexander Dziadosz. "Sudan Recognizes Independence of Oil-Rich South." Reuters, 8 July 2011.
***Like other countries, Sudan has felt the sting of colonialism, but that pain seems to have been especially detrimental on the South. Indeed, it was in the South that the British purposely limited education to a select group, among other limitations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Experiment

My social studies students and I are studying Islam right now. The other day, we were reading about one of the Five Pillars, zakat (charity in Islam that means "that which purifies"). Muslims believe that giving away money helps to purify it and also "safeguards [them] against miserliness" (1). I asked the class if this was true, that giving money away makes us less greedy. They generally agreed that it does. I wanted to test whether or not they really believed this, so I handed a volunteer a $10 bill. I told the class that I would ask for the bill back the next day. I said that they should pass the bill around among their classmates, and that as a result, there would be no way for me to know who had the bill. For that reason, whoever wanted to keep the money could keep it. Even if I did learn who kept it, I told them, I would not punish that person. I wanted them to be motivated by their own honesty. The next day, I asked for the bill, and a student handed it to me...