Skip to main content

The Crutch

"...some worshiped the mathematics because it provided a refuge from thought and from feeling." (John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath)

It seems a well-worn saying that Christianity is a "crutch" for the weak, a way for people to find security by believing that there is an omnipotent God in control. While I disagree with the intent of the charge (to dismiss the faith for their own lives, believing it is only a convenience for the weak), I do agree in part with the conclusion. Let me explain. Those who make the charge imply that the weak adopt Christianity as a salve for their fearful minds. This is true for some. Some people do adopt the faith, and hold to it, because they need to lean on God for comfort in an insecure world.

In fact, those who accept God's comfort, who seek it and live in it, find great security, even while hell is breaking loose around them. Look at the support from Scripture:

"For in the day of trouble he will keep me safe in his dwelling; he will hide me in the shelter of his sacred tent and set me high upon a rock." (Psalm 27:5)

"He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart....A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you." (Psalm 91:4,7)

Even-- and especially-- death is left helpless against the believer: "Where, O Death, is your victory? Where, O Death, is your sting?" (I Cor. 15:55)

Such thinking about the faith being a crutch, then, is not surprising, because those who need it are receiving God's intended comfort for them. Unfortunately, the "crutch" charge implies that shelter is the only reason people believe in God or Christ. Certainly there were weak believers in the early church, but there were also strong ones. The differences between them, in fact, became salient enough that Paul felt it necessary to write about how they were to treat each another (Romans 14). Just as significant for our day, there are historic and contemporary examples of those who have believed from a place of reason, rather than from that of fear (C.S. Lewis and Alister McGrath are examples).

It seems that animosity toward the idea of this crutch Christianity comes from a cultural emphasis on independence. No Christian should be ashamed, however, that he or she needs God for security. Everyone takes security from something, including those who make the charge that the Christian faith is just a crutch. It's worth remembering, however, that believing must involve the mind, just as it does the heart. We are compelled to follow Paul's example in 2 Corinthians 10:5: "We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Experiment

My social studies students and I are studying Islam right now. The other day, we were reading about one of the Five Pillars, zakat (charity in Islam that means "that which purifies"). Muslims believe that giving away money helps to purify it and also "safeguards [them] against miserliness" (1). I asked the class if this was true, that giving money away makes us less greedy. They generally agreed that it does. I wanted to test whether or not they really believed this, so I handed a volunteer a $10 bill. I told the class that I would ask for the bill back the next day. I said that they should pass the bill around among their classmates, and that as a result, there would be no way for me to know who had the bill. For that reason, whoever wanted to keep the money could keep it. Even if I did learn who kept it, I told them, I would not punish that person. I wanted them to be motivated by their own honesty. The next day, I asked for the bill, and a student handed it to me...