Skip to main content

The Crutch

"...some worshiped the mathematics because it provided a refuge from thought and from feeling." (John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath)

It seems a well-worn saying that Christianity is a "crutch" for the weak, a way for people to find security by believing that there is an omnipotent God in control. While I disagree with the intent of the charge (to dismiss the faith for their own lives, believing it is only a convenience for the weak), I do agree in part with the conclusion. Let me explain. Those who make the charge imply that the weak adopt Christianity as a salve for their fearful minds. This is true for some. Some people do adopt the faith, and hold to it, because they need to lean on God for comfort in an insecure world.

In fact, those who accept God's comfort, who seek it and live in it, find great security, even while hell is breaking loose around them. Look at the support from Scripture:

"For in the day of trouble he will keep me safe in his dwelling; he will hide me in the shelter of his sacred tent and set me high upon a rock." (Psalm 27:5)

"He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart....A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you." (Psalm 91:4,7)

Even-- and especially-- death is left helpless against the believer: "Where, O Death, is your victory? Where, O Death, is your sting?" (I Cor. 15:55)

Such thinking about the faith being a crutch, then, is not surprising, because those who need it are receiving God's intended comfort for them. Unfortunately, the "crutch" charge implies that shelter is the only reason people believe in God or Christ. Certainly there were weak believers in the early church, but there were also strong ones. The differences between them, in fact, became salient enough that Paul felt it necessary to write about how they were to treat each another (Romans 14). Just as significant for our day, there are historic and contemporary examples of those who have believed from a place of reason, rather than from that of fear (C.S. Lewis and Alister McGrath are examples).

It seems that animosity toward the idea of this crutch Christianity comes from a cultural emphasis on independence. No Christian should be ashamed, however, that he or she needs God for security. Everyone takes security from something, including those who make the charge that the Christian faith is just a crutch. It's worth remembering, however, that believing must involve the mind, just as it does the heart. We are compelled to follow Paul's example in 2 Corinthians 10:5: "We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...
2 comments
Read more