Skip to main content

Gaming

I played a lot of video games growing up. When I think about that, my first response is to believe it was a waste of time; but when I look at the context in which I played those games, though, a tendency-- or pattern-- seems to surface that explains why they were so magnetic to me. I think it is informative to survey this tendency to understand why games are so popular today.

I can think of two general principles that apply to the popularity of gaming, especially for males. First, social interaction is not always easy. This seems to be especially true for males, and perhaps more so for prepubescent males; and yet, being human, those males need intellectual stimulation. They get it through video games. The fact that games offer that stimulation without the need for socially appropriate behavior offers him a way to satisfy his need for entertainment without feeling compelled to perform socially. Importantly, and under the same point, gaming allows him a measure of control. He decides when to play and when to leave his game.

Second, males need to feel like they are worthwhile, like they mean something to others, or at least that they are being productive. Treat this next point with skepticism, but it seems to me that video games fulfill a male's need to be heroic or productive, albeit artificially. When he steps into the role of his character, he takes on the qualities of that character and leaves what could for him be a mundane lifestyle. It is a means of escape. I suppose the same can be true for those who read for the same purpose: game and book (and blog, I admit) offer a way to escape a less-than-perfect life to pretend you are something or someone more satisfying.

Some of what I am saying, of course, seems to contradict the statistics on game playing. There are differing statistics, but the average age of gamers seems to rest in the early to mid thirties (a 2009 report* had it at 32 and a 2011 statistic** reported 35), and the male-to-female ratio is more balanced than you might believe: two sources show that sixty percent of gamers are male and forty percent are female.*** The latter statistic may have to do with an industry that has broadened its target market to include adults and females, rather than teenage males alone (recall that I was one of those males). Still, I believe the same motivations to play those games exist, especially in younger males.

If I had to do it over again, I wouldn't completely restrict myself from playing games. After all, they acted as a common interest that allowed my friends and I to enjoy our time together. Still, I would have tried to balance things a little more for myself. As far as any children I may have in the future, I would definitely allow gaming, but under what I see as healthy guidelines (i.e., in the family room only, balanced with social interaction, perhaps reserved for weekends, etc.). I have to remember, too, that the need to escape isn't a bad thing. Like much else, using entertainment to escape simply needs to be balanced with other life activities (consider the extreme example of a twenty year-old man who died of pulmonary embolism-- he died of a blockage in the lung or lungs because he sat in one place too long, in this case, playing video games). This is just one person's perspective on the matter, but I think my personal experience may help me to understand what I would do differently now. This is why we study history, I guess.

*Entertainment Software Association. "2009 Sales, Demographic and Usage Data: Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry," 2009.
**Education Database Online. "Video Game Statistics," 2011.
***Both above sources

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...