Skip to main content

Gaming

I played a lot of video games growing up. When I think about that, my first response is to believe it was a waste of time; but when I look at the context in which I played those games, though, a tendency-- or pattern-- seems to surface that explains why they were so magnetic to me. I think it is informative to survey this tendency to understand why games are so popular today.

I can think of two general principles that apply to the popularity of gaming, especially for males. First, social interaction is not always easy. This seems to be especially true for males, and perhaps more so for prepubescent males; and yet, being human, those males need intellectual stimulation. They get it through video games. The fact that games offer that stimulation without the need for socially appropriate behavior offers him a way to satisfy his need for entertainment without feeling compelled to perform socially. Importantly, and under the same point, gaming allows him a measure of control. He decides when to play and when to leave his game.

Second, males need to feel like they are worthwhile, like they mean something to others, or at least that they are being productive. Treat this next point with skepticism, but it seems to me that video games fulfill a male's need to be heroic or productive, albeit artificially. When he steps into the role of his character, he takes on the qualities of that character and leaves what could for him be a mundane lifestyle. It is a means of escape. I suppose the same can be true for those who read for the same purpose: game and book (and blog, I admit) offer a way to escape a less-than-perfect life to pretend you are something or someone more satisfying.

Some of what I am saying, of course, seems to contradict the statistics on game playing. There are differing statistics, but the average age of gamers seems to rest in the early to mid thirties (a 2009 report* had it at 32 and a 2011 statistic** reported 35), and the male-to-female ratio is more balanced than you might believe: two sources show that sixty percent of gamers are male and forty percent are female.*** The latter statistic may have to do with an industry that has broadened its target market to include adults and females, rather than teenage males alone (recall that I was one of those males). Still, I believe the same motivations to play those games exist, especially in younger males.

If I had to do it over again, I wouldn't completely restrict myself from playing games. After all, they acted as a common interest that allowed my friends and I to enjoy our time together. Still, I would have tried to balance things a little more for myself. As far as any children I may have in the future, I would definitely allow gaming, but under what I see as healthy guidelines (i.e., in the family room only, balanced with social interaction, perhaps reserved for weekends, etc.). I have to remember, too, that the need to escape isn't a bad thing. Like much else, using entertainment to escape simply needs to be balanced with other life activities (consider the extreme example of a twenty year-old man who died of pulmonary embolism-- he died of a blockage in the lung or lungs because he sat in one place too long, in this case, playing video games). This is just one person's perspective on the matter, but I think my personal experience may help me to understand what I would do differently now. This is why we study history, I guess.

*Entertainment Software Association. "2009 Sales, Demographic and Usage Data: Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry," 2009.
**Education Database Online. "Video Game Statistics," 2011.
***Both above sources

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...

Learning and Change

In a recent article in National Geographic ( "Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science "), Joel Achenbach attempted to explain why humans have trouble believing the evidence laid out in scientific research. In the article, he cited a phenomenon called confirmation bias , our tendency to adopt the evidence that fits what we already believe. Now, I am a feeling person by nature. Subconsciously, I make choices in my environment based on my emotional reaction to it. Similarly, I have found that the information I remember most is the information I respond to with strong emotion, whether that emotion is humor, anger, shock, or something else. This is why I believe confirmation bias exists: we respond to facts emotionally. However, sometimes we learn information that, instead of confirming what we believe, has the opposite effect. We are introduced to facts that shock us out of our complacency. That shock can jar us into questioning long-held beliefs, and even entire worldviews...