Skip to main content

Stuff

Our possessions are often very important to us, so much so that we even try to take them with us when we die. One of the most spectacular tombs still evident today is found in China. Records of the burial site of China’s first emperor, named Chinshi Huangdi (ruled 221-207 B.C.), state that the man himself was buried in a large chamber full of “precious stones” and “fine vessels,” great treasure. Jewels that represent the sun, moon, and starts are said to line the ceiling of this chamber; while the floor is recorded to contain “rivers of mercury” that represent the earth. More than that, the man is guarded by 8,099 clay soldiers, each one different from the rest in both appearance and height. The tallest are the generals, who tower at 6 ft., 6 inches. There are also horses and other figures besides the soldiers. It’s said that their purpose was to help him rule another empire in the afterlife, and for protection. His tomb, which is supposed to be a type of palace, is estimated to have required 700,000 workers around 36 years to complete. In it are offices, halls, and a wall with gated entrances.

Other historical accounts from China and Egypt tell us that even slaves have been killed and buried with their masters (some have been buried alive). In China, one ruler (Duke Wu) was buried with over 60 slaves, while another (later, Duke Mu) was buried with 177 slaves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...