Skip to main content

Emotional Avoidance

My students' journaling this week involves how we handle our emotions. I'm showing them that teenagers' brains differ than adults' in the making of decisions, and that emotional avoidance is unhealthy. By that, I mean avoiding painful feelings is unhealthy because you have to go to increasingly greater lengths to make sure you don't feel the way you hate to feel (yes, I'm actually trying to sway their opinion on something, which I normally do not like to do, but I know that this is an important lesson for them to learn young).

It's almost like an anti-drug: instead of searching for a high in some substance or practice, you're guarding yourself against the "low" of painful emotion (fear, anxiety, jealousy, anger, stress, etc.). You end up going farther and farther to keep away from those feelings, but end up spending much of your energy doing so. I wouldn't be surprised to find that one source of obsessive-compulsive behavior is emotional avoidance.

I do not think this means we should give full vent to all of our emotions all the time, but emotional avoidance is no solution to keeping free of pain. It seems as though it will keep us safe in the high towers of emotional safety, complete with bars on the windows and locks on the door. You stay for awhile, and get comfortable; but before long, you won't exactly remember how to get out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...

Learning and Change

In a recent article in National Geographic ( "Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science "), Joel Achenbach attempted to explain why humans have trouble believing the evidence laid out in scientific research. In the article, he cited a phenomenon called confirmation bias , our tendency to adopt the evidence that fits what we already believe. Now, I am a feeling person by nature. Subconsciously, I make choices in my environment based on my emotional reaction to it. Similarly, I have found that the information I remember most is the information I respond to with strong emotion, whether that emotion is humor, anger, shock, or something else. This is why I believe confirmation bias exists: we respond to facts emotionally. However, sometimes we learn information that, instead of confirming what we believe, has the opposite effect. We are introduced to facts that shock us out of our complacency. That shock can jar us into questioning long-held beliefs, and even entire worldviews...