Skip to main content

Something More

My eighth-grade students were studying poetry awhile back. In the midst of this, I had each of them introduce and recite a poem that he or she liked. When one of my classes finished, someone asked if I would recite one from memory. Caught a little off-guard, I told them I would read one of my own (it was sitting in the room already because I'd told a student I would share one of my poems, but never got around to it). I can't tell you how nervous I was reading that poem to my students (my principal happened to be there, too). The nervousness was bad enough that I actually had to stop mid-poem to calm myself.

I rarely feel this way in front of my classes anymore, but it was different here, and I know why. Despite the fact that I speak day in and day out, all of my words are mere recitations of academic concepts or commentary on events that involve other people. Very little of it-- and I try to keep it this way-- involves my personal life.

This is a good thing. Teachers should keep a professional distance from their students. I didn't think this poem would violate that principal, but it did. I didn't realize that this poem was even somewhat of a reflection of my own feelings, but it was. The event simply confirms something that's come up now and then in my mind as a teacher: this profession tends to accentuate your quirks and personality traits because you are so visible to the students, so visible in fact that they become to you a mirror, reflecting your behavior and attitudes. They see and often point out things about you that even you are not aware of. In this case, what the poetry failure emphasizes is that I am both guarded and sensitive.

I hate that about myself. Guys aren't supposed to be sensitive. They are supposed to be like Daniel Craig at the end of Cowboys and Aliens, the Marlboro-Man type who rides off into the sunset alone, who listens to no one and needs no one. They are supposed to be independent. I've tried to be this, and I can put up a pretty solid front most of the time; but if there's anything that will take you off your pedestal and thrust you into reality, it's letting yourself be seen-- really seen-- by people who need you to be something more, or at least those you think need you to be something more.

That, I think, is the very issue. I have believed that it is my place to be strong for those around me, to be physically, intellectually, and emotionally available to anyone who needs it; but not to lay any burden of need on others. This has led, of course, to some necessary isolation. It is impossible to be in relationship and not be seen as a human being. I can play the role of an available person by being open with my feelings and yet never truly let others see what I fear and love.

So I am not the Marlboro Man. So what? I guess that means I'm sensitive. I also like poetry, and if it takes me pausing to collect myself to learn a measure of self-acceptance, I think I'm in a better place than I was before; and certainly so if can lay down my shield, if I can let go of the person who directed his energies into fulfilling the role of a mannequin man representing what all men are supposed to be. By being me and becoming "less," I believe that I will truly become more.*

*Make no mistake. I doubt I will ever put myself in the poetry-reading position again. That was just awkward!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as
2 comments
Read more