Skip to main content

Swarm Intelligence

The idea of robots is not new, and mention of them goes back to at least classical Greek times. In Homer’s Iliad, for example, a Greek god named Hephaestus created armor for the hero Achilles. Later, around 1495, Leonardo Da Vinci created specifications for a robot that could wave its arms, sit up, and move its jaw and head. Still, use of robots has become widespread only recently. Among the more interesting types of robots we use today is one called the swarm robot. This type of robot was inspired by colonies of insects (like bees or ants), and is distinct from other types, in that the robots act together. Because of it, these robots are said to use what’s called “swarm intelligence,” wherein the individuals behave together as one superorganism. In much the same way birds will flock in a single group and ants will work collectively, these robots are employed to work together to complete one major task. The U.S. military, for example, was recently working with the idea of swarm intelligence to control unmanned vehicles. More interesting, two researchers have argued that nanobot swarms can possibly be used in the human body to destroy cancer tumors. For the more mundane tasks of life, swarm robots can be useful for things like dispersing to find something hidden, to spy, or to clean. The benefit to this type of robot is that even if several of these robots fail or malfunction, the rest can still complete the task.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as