Skip to main content

Cell Phone Safety

When my parents gave me a cell phone in 1997, I was skeptical. Whether it was because I'm slow to accept change, skeptical of things I don't understand, I heard about the risks, or for all of these reasons, I didn't embrace the technology easily. I would use my new phone sparingly. Since then, there have been numerous studies about the safety and dangers of cell phone use, whether from radiation exposure or from distracted walking and driving. My students this week debate on this issue. Here is some of what I found:

Researchers in a 2008 Ohio State University study compared pedestrians who walked with no technology, those who walked while listening to i-pods, and those who walked while talking on cell phones. They found that those who walked while talking on cell phones were more likely to walk into oncoming traffic than the other two groups (1). More recently, computer science researchers at Dartmouth University and the University of Bologna created an Android smartphone application that uses the camera on the back of a phone to detect oncoming vehicles. The application then warns the cell phone user with sound and vibrations coming from the phone that the vehicle is coming (2).

After reading many studies about the safety of cell phones, thirty-one scientists from the World Health Organization in 2011 concluded that cell phones are “possibly carcinogenic [cancer-causing] to humans.” An author from WHO reporting on this study reported, however, that "results of animals studies consistently show no increased cancer risk for long-term exposure to radiofrequency fields" (3).

The closer the cell phone is to the human head, the more the person is exposed to radiofrequency (RF) radiation. A phone produces more RF radiation when there is a weak signal—and when in a moving vehicle-- because it must work harder to establish a connection. Finally, a “radiation shield” on the phone may actually cause the phone to produce more radiation to connect with other phones, and children are more vulnerable to this radiation compared to adults because their skulls and scalps are thinner and possible because their brain cells divide more quickly compared to adults (4).

Cell phones and other electronic devices have been known to interfere with navigation during airline flights. Specifically, a 2003 NASA study found that cell phone connections could produce emissions that could interfere with an airplane’s navigation (GPS) system. This is used to help a pilot land an airplane, especially when the pilot cannot see the runway because of clouds or other weather conditions (5).
 
Airlines already do not allow cell phones to be used on flights because they can interfere with the plane’s navigation instruments, but research from 2003 suggests that passengers break this rule (5). Airlines are under pressure to allow cell phones in flight because travelers—especially business travelers—want to stay connected to clients and coworkers, family, and others.

1. Nasar, Jack, Hecht, Peter and Richard Wener. “Mobile Telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 (2008) 69-75. Web. 11 May 2012.
2. Wang, Tianyu, Cardone, Giuseppe and Antonio Corradi. “WalkSafe: A Pedestrian Safety App for Mobile Phone Users Who Walk and Talk While Crossing Roads.” Hanover, NH and Bologna, Italy: Dartmouth College and the University of Bologna, 2012. Web. 11 May 2012.
3. “Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Mobile Phones.” The World Health Organization. June 2011. Web. 12 May 2012.
4. “Cell Phone Safety Fact Sheet.” Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine. June 2011. Web. 12 May 2012.
5. Strauss, Bill, M. Granger Morgan, Jay Apt, and Daniel D. Stancil. “Unsafe at Any Airspeed?” Carnegie Mellon University, 2006. Web. 12 May 2012.

Comments

  1. Kara LeAnnMay 13, 2012 at 7:31 PM

    I think the joy that we don't always understand goes right along with the "peace that transcends all understanding". Phillipians 4:7 ~

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...
Post a Comment
Read more