Skip to main content

2012 Haiti Team Interview Four: Mike

Of all the members of our team, I found no one with such spiritual depth, forged by personal experience, than Michael. He was at once a voice of spiritual reason and comfort, at times pointing out the spiritual nature of Haiti, at times calling us to prayer. He recognized, too-- and said so-- that the moments of mutual encouragement in our evening meetings were what the church was truly about. When Michael spoke, it was often to share some spiritual understanding that we may have missed, and there was about him a spiritual authority that helped balance the more practical side of our work in Haiti.

At the same time, there was a wholly practical side to Michael. In fact, it was Michael who stayed at the orphanage to finish his work for the day while the rest of us were whisked away to the beach. It was Michael who used his knowledge as a furniture maker to build six full bunk beds in a matter of days. It was Michael who felt the pressure to build those beds by the end of the workweek for a group of short-term missionaries who would by Friday need a place to sleep, and it was Michael who met that goal with time to spare.

This balance of spiritual and practical knowledge, I learned, came from the struggles he has faced in life, some of which were struggles he himself created. In fact, he was to me a reminder that our God takes our hardships-- even if we create them ourselves-- and uses them to benefit and grow us, to move us in new directions. In short, Mike reminded me with his life that our God is redemptive.

It is not surprising, then, how one man can at once exude humility and authority, gentleness and power. Mike did, because he knows the nature of his God, that he is both sovereign and nurturing, father and mother, Lion and Lamb. This dual example was eye-opening for a person who spends much of his time wading near the spiritual surface. It was Mike's insight, in fact, that caught me the most, an insight that I know was borne out of time spent in prayer and reflection. Above all, Mike helped me see that there was more to Haiti than just buildings and landscape. There was in it a very spiritual nature that calls us to prayer.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...
Post a Comment
Read more