Skip to main content

2012 Haiti Team Interview Seven: Julie

Julie's faith was an example to me. Sitting on the steps of the orphanage on a warm evening, she relayed the joy she felt from serving in this place, the peace at having seen God confirm in heart what she already knew in mind: that God would meet our needs as our trip unfolded.

She herself wasn't certain she could come a second time to help lead. This was not, I gathered, because she felt incapable of leading, but because of the struggles she faced at home. There was certainly much to distract Julie from the purposes of this trip, but instead of allowing those things to divert her attention, she embraced her role here fully.

Part of that role involved what comes so naturally to Julie: prayer. This was her strength, that in moments of conflict or need, she prompts others to submit them first to God. It is this spiritual dependence, which others would perhaps see as a weakness, that gives Julie such intimacy with her Father. You could see this intimacy in the peace she felt here amid the chaos taking place at home, and in the conviction she feels about the church's future role in Haiti. Julie's desire is that future trips would involve not just teams of people, but teams of churches who work together to send larger teams to Haiti. More personally, Julie's dream is to have a family one day and begin serving as a missionary. Just as the orphanage directors serve in Haiti, so she, too, wants to serve.

Such vision for the future is perhaps not surprising. There was in Julie a sense of destiny, of certainty as to God's specific and personal plan for each member of the team. I got the impression, in fact, that Julie saw our trip as a personally-authored story. She saw, for instance, that the trip was announced in several ways on different occasions, giving around 1,500 people at the church the opportunity to come. She noted that the team did not form overnight, but developed over time, which implied an intentionality and carefulness about who would go; and she found that while we could have had more team members join us, no one else did. The clear message, then, was that God had carefully chosen those who joined the team.

The story did not end there, however. God had also personally prepared Julie for the trip in a very unique way. At home, as her sister went into labor, she needed Julie to care for the other children. Being ill, however, these children were contentious and whiny. As difficult as this was for Julie, she began to see the larger purpose God had in mind for it one evening in Haiti. It was on this evening that a child followed her for two hours, asking for candy. Instead of dismissing the child by forcing him away, however, she thought back to her sister's children, seeing in this child the same craving for a parent that her sister's children had for their mother. It was God's way of allowing Julie to see through the eyes of an orphan, to empathize with the pain of not having a father or mother.

Such insight into God's plan and character served to teach me something I did not at first see about Julie. Simply put, it is that she treats each moment as a gift to be cherished. That moment can be pleasant or painful, suffuse with light or flooded with darkness, but it is always a moment to be learned from, to be used to increase her own or others' awareness of God's heart and plan. The teacher, we know, is also the author, and while the stories he writes are not yet fully written, we are promised that we will find in them hope and a future. I am convinced that Julie will take an active role in her story, a role that with her faithfulness and vision will lead her into a life of purpose.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...