Skip to main content

Unions and the Minimum Wage

The following narrative is John Steinbeck's account of the working class during the Great Depression, as relayed in The Grapes of Wrath. In the 1930s, the price of produce dropped, which left small farm owners with inadequate income to remain solvent. Owners of larger farms then purchased these smaller plots, which consolidated land under a relative few corporations. These corporations were able to remain profitable because they also controlled canneries in which the unneeded and unprofitable fruit could be canned, stored, and sold later when produce prices rose.

Migrant families from the eastern part of the United States, in the meantime, poured into California on hearing of plentiful work as farm hands. So numerous were these Okies, as they were derogatorily named, that they competed for the few jobs available on the corporate farms. Moreover, farm owners cut the wages of those who did find work, knowing that laborers would choose a job that offered something rather than starve. At the same time, these corporations felt threatened by the sheer numbers of migrants, and especially of the potential for these workers to unite against them. They therefore hired security to terrorize them, while local police did what they could to disband the "Hoovervilles" (migrant roadside camps), which included physical intimidation and the burning of the camps themselves.

Wages having fallen to insecure levels, families began to starve, leading to malnutrition with diseases like pellagra. At the same time, the price of produce had not risen, leading farm owners to restrict the supply of that produce artificially to raise prices. This led to the sad circumstance of a working class on the brink of starvation while farms slaughtered and buried pigs, dumped potatoes in rivers and kept guards near to prevent people from fetching them, and poured kerosene on piles of oranges to destroy them.

Violent strikebreaking occurred when workers did form unions, with police and security breaking up camps and targeting union leaders who helped organize them.

With a minimum wage in place, the working class is secured against wages below a viable living standard, and with the ability to form unions, workers can create a front strong enough to challenge unjust wages and treatment. Given the state and federal minimum wage and safety laws we have in place protecting employees, we certainly do not need unions as much as we once did. Whether we need them at all is a topic still debated today. In California, the teacher's association is a powerful group that pushed back against a proposition (32) that would have barred unions from automatically deducting wages from a member's paycheck. Had it passed, many union members would have opted not to pay their fees, largely reducing the unions' incomes and, as a result, their political power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Experiment

My social studies students and I are studying Islam right now. The other day, we were reading about one of the Five Pillars, zakat (charity in Islam that means "that which purifies"). Muslims believe that giving away money helps to purify it and also "safeguards [them] against miserliness" (1). I asked the class if this was true, that giving money away makes us less greedy. They generally agreed that it does. I wanted to test whether or not they really believed this, so I handed a volunteer a $10 bill. I told the class that I would ask for the bill back the next day. I said that they should pass the bill around among their classmates, and that as a result, there would be no way for me to know who had the bill. For that reason, whoever wanted to keep the money could keep it. Even if I did learn who kept it, I told them, I would not punish that person. I wanted them to be motivated by their own honesty. The next day, I asked for the bill, and a student handed it to me...