Skip to main content

Unions and the Minimum Wage

The following narrative is John Steinbeck's account of the working class during the Great Depression, as relayed in The Grapes of Wrath. In the 1930s, the price of produce dropped, which left small farm owners with inadequate income to remain solvent. Owners of larger farms then purchased these smaller plots, which consolidated land under a relative few corporations. These corporations were able to remain profitable because they also controlled canneries in which the unneeded and unprofitable fruit could be canned, stored, and sold later when produce prices rose.

Migrant families from the eastern part of the United States, in the meantime, poured into California on hearing of plentiful work as farm hands. So numerous were these Okies, as they were derogatorily named, that they competed for the few jobs available on the corporate farms. Moreover, farm owners cut the wages of those who did find work, knowing that laborers would choose a job that offered something rather than starve. At the same time, these corporations felt threatened by the sheer numbers of migrants, and especially of the potential for these workers to unite against them. They therefore hired security to terrorize them, while local police did what they could to disband the "Hoovervilles" (migrant roadside camps), which included physical intimidation and the burning of the camps themselves.

Wages having fallen to insecure levels, families began to starve, leading to malnutrition with diseases like pellagra. At the same time, the price of produce had not risen, leading farm owners to restrict the supply of that produce artificially to raise prices. This led to the sad circumstance of a working class on the brink of starvation while farms slaughtered and buried pigs, dumped potatoes in rivers and kept guards near to prevent people from fetching them, and poured kerosene on piles of oranges to destroy them.

Violent strikebreaking occurred when workers did form unions, with police and security breaking up camps and targeting union leaders who helped organize them.

With a minimum wage in place, the working class is secured against wages below a viable living standard, and with the ability to form unions, workers can create a front strong enough to challenge unjust wages and treatment. Given the state and federal minimum wage and safety laws we have in place protecting employees, we certainly do not need unions as much as we once did. Whether we need them at all is a topic still debated today. In California, the teacher's association is a powerful group that pushed back against a proposition (32) that would have barred unions from automatically deducting wages from a member's paycheck. Had it passed, many union members would have opted not to pay their fees, largely reducing the unions' incomes and, as a result, their political power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...

Learning and Change

In a recent article in National Geographic ( "Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science "), Joel Achenbach attempted to explain why humans have trouble believing the evidence laid out in scientific research. In the article, he cited a phenomenon called confirmation bias , our tendency to adopt the evidence that fits what we already believe. Now, I am a feeling person by nature. Subconsciously, I make choices in my environment based on my emotional reaction to it. Similarly, I have found that the information I remember most is the information I respond to with strong emotion, whether that emotion is humor, anger, shock, or something else. This is why I believe confirmation bias exists: we respond to facts emotionally. However, sometimes we learn information that, instead of confirming what we believe, has the opposite effect. We are introduced to facts that shock us out of our complacency. That shock can jar us into questioning long-held beliefs, and even entire worldviews...