Skip to main content

What Happens in Vegas Does Not Stay in Vegas

I got a tattoo over the weekend. Okay, it's only a spray-on tattoo, but it is the visual reminder of my weekend, of a night on the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk with my leadership students and over 700 other junior high school students. I have received comments, questions, and even a look from a stranger about the tattoo, most of which have required me to explain its origin. This tattoo is a symbol of my past, and these events show me that my decision to get one in the past has affected me in the present.

The same is true for all our decisions. The choices we make in the past, whether public or private, influence our present perceptions, behavior, and dispositions. This is true not only for major life decisions-- a career path or spouse, for instance-- but even for the daily habits of thinking in which we actively and passively engage. For the major life choices, a person's choice of career is a more obvious example. In my own life, my decision to teach junior high school students has affected my disposition to a noticeable extent. In this role, I am compelled to organize and lead, to advocate and express opinions, to correct myself and others, and so reflect and learn, so much so and with such regularity that my behavior in the classroom has affected my behavior and outlook on life outside it. I am firmer in my personal boundaries than was true in the past because I am required to be this way with students. My place as an English teacher has influenced what I choose to read in my spare time, and even the fact that I read at all; and my problem-solving practices and observations in the classroom have affected my perception of how problems should be solved in theory and how they actually are solved in reality. Even my choice of when to listen and when to speak has been tempered in part by turn-taking practices in the classroom.

If we are influenced by major life choices, we are still more affected by our habits of thinking. Although our thinking habits are less obvious than major life decisions, I believe they influence our perceptions about our abilities and limits more widely; determine our attitudes toward our respective pasts, presents, and futures more broadly; and affect our perspectives about own and others' worth more thoroughly than our more obvious life choices. What you choose to make of yourself when you look in the mirror-- and I do believe that what you make of yourself is a choice-- manifests itself most visibly in how you behave alone and with others; and how you choose to view others in relation to you affects how you will behave toward them. A person who sees others as obstacles to overcome a problem will treat a person very differently than one who sees them as partners in order to solve it. Someone accustomed to snap judgments will respond differently to a person than one who chooses to reserve them. If you spend enough time with a person, in fact, you can decipher what he or she thinks of himself or others, and his or her general outlook on life, without that person ever telling you so.

This does not mean we are a mere product of our environment, on the one hand, and that we are only what we think, on the other. Human beings are more complex creatures than is sometimes presented in the nature-nurture debate, and our own perceptions about ourselves and others can change. It is only to say that we must believe about ourselves what God believes about us, and we must respond by believing that he sees others in the same way. This mindset comes only with the practice encouraged by the presence of the Holy Spirit. Like a spray-on tattoo, then, a person's mindset about himself or herself and others can fade enough so that the reality of a person becomes visible. I certainly have far to go in this regard, but I can be encouraged in the hope that it is possible with God's help.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Soul and Spirit

As a friend told me about a conversation she had with one of our pastors about whether animals go to heaven, she told me about the Hebrew word nephesh ("soul"). I wondered, then, what the difference was between soul and spirit. After a little research, I came across what many seem to agree is a main difference. The soul of a person is that person's being--personality and life--while the spirit is that part of us that connects with God. There are several verses that refer to spirit in this way:* "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14) "But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ." (1 Corinthians 3:1) "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly p...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...