Skip to main content

Straw Man

I learned of the straw man while taking a class titled "Economic History of the United States" in college. A straw man is a type of fallacy in an argument. Specifically, a straw man is an argument leveled against another argument that no one ever made. For example, I could fight back against the claim that our culture is losing its innocence when, in fact, no one is making such a claim; or I could lament the argument that we should eliminate public speaking courses in college while no one is advocating that we get rid of these courses to begin with.

While this is a very real fallacy in the academic world, it is no less significant in our daily thinking. I believe its form is a little different, though (though maybe you will call this argument a straw man, too). Our straw men can be arguments, yes; but they can also be problems or fears that are both unnecessary and created entirely by us. Take, for example, the sense that we sometimes have that our problems are somehow unique, that no one could understand them because no one has experienced them the way that we have. Such a belief may lead the person thinking it to avoid discussing it with others, for fear that others may not understand or may even become judgmental.

Said explicitly like this, the argument perhaps sounds illogical enough to be called a straw man. You might be thinking, Who would believe this? It is more logical to believe that we think this way, though, if you consider that some of our thoughts are subconscious, not explicit. If this thought fell into this more subtle form of thinking, when the thought is a feeling and an intuition rather than a concrete thought, it seems more likely that the person thinking it would actually be deceived into believing it.

Importantly, this kind of fear becomes far less threatening when we realize that we are not, in fact, special in experiencing it. In fact, it is when we begin to discuss our fears with others that we learn that other people often feel the same way. This is why it is so important to communicate our concerns with others. By doing this, we learn that we are not the awful monsters we think we are, but are much like most everyone else. The monster, instead, is in our minds. The point is that by vocalizing our worries, we normalize them.

Such an act allows us to see the straw man for what it is, and to burn it. :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Soul and Spirit

As a friend told me about a conversation she had with one of our pastors about whether animals go to heaven, she told me about the Hebrew word nephesh ("soul"). I wondered, then, what the difference was between soul and spirit. After a little research, I came across what many seem to agree is a main difference. The soul of a person is that person's being--personality and life--while the spirit is that part of us that connects with God. There are several verses that refer to spirit in this way:* "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14) "But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ." (1 Corinthians 3:1) "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly p...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...