Skip to main content

Confession

For as long as I can remember, I have believed that men have an innate ability to understand the difference between right and wrong. I still believe this, but I also know that we can justify actions in our minds to quiet the guilt and give ourselves permission to commit acts that violate God, others, and ourselves. While we can certainly do this in our social circles, I believe it is easiest to justify wrong behaviors when we are isolated. This is because there is no one to check those behaviors, no one to hold a man accountable for them. There is great power in confession, therefore, because it brings to light thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors that others can help weight to be right or wrong.

If a man is willing to admit to himself that his behaviors have been harmful, he is given sudden access to a powerful tool, the discipline of confession. As one practices this discipline, I believe that a man's mindset begins to change, whether slowly or quickly. The more he makes others aware of his behaviors, the more he hears that what he is doing is wrong, and thus, the more he begins to see it as wrong himself. When he opens himself up to this admission and truthfulness, he is more likely to change. Long-entrenched behaviors begin to fall like dominoes until he finds himself becoming whole once more. This is the power of confession. A man who may be near-completely unwilling to change at the outset then begins to see the wisdom of others' words.

Like other disciplines, however, confession must be joined with the faith to act, in this case with repentance. A man must be willing to do the opposite of what he was doing in the past. When he does, however, what perhaps he thought at first to be wisdom is then exposed as foolishness. "There is a way that appears to be right," says the Biblical Proverbs, "but in the end it leads to death."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Comparison

Psychologists and others have studied ways in which we compare ourselves to each other. One man named Leon Festinger argued that we tend to compare ourselves to other people when we don’t know how good or bad we are at something (like football or playing the guitar). One way we do this is when we compare ourselves to those who are not as good as we are, to protect our self-esteem (called “downward social comparison;” example: we’re playing basketball and miss most of our shots, but we feel okay because a teammate wasn’t even given the ball). Another comparison we make is when we compare ourselves to others who are doing much better than we are (called “upward social comparison”). When we see others who appear to be doing better than we are, we can respond by trying to improve ourselves, or by trying to protect ourselves by telling ourselves it’s not that important. There was a study published in 1953 by Solomon Asch, who asked students to take part in a “vision test.” The par...

Thoughts on Academic Purpose

If I could tell my students how to choose a path of employment, I would emphasize that no effective writer, historian, athlete, musician, or scientist became such without dedicating themselves to some goal. For that to have taken place, however, the respective expert must have had a firm idea about why they were doing what they were doing. In other words, they must have had purpose. Karl Marx spent countless hours in English libraries, I would share, to understand the functioning of society in order to improve it; while Isaac Newton often went without food to gain a firmer grasp of the science of motion, and eventually revised that science. They did this because they had a clear purpose, a real reason for doing what they were doing that would affect others around them. I would communicate that whatever passion students tap into, it should be embarked upon with that kind of clear goal in mind. While they may not know which passions they have yet, I would emphasize that school is a time ...