Skip to main content

The Leap

In September of 2014, when Gallup asked a sample of Americans whether they trust the federal government to handle international and domestic problems, the number of people who marked "None at all" was at its highest point since May of 1972. Respondents even showed a decreasing tendency to trust themselves.* Such distrust goes back to this country's inception. Richard Hofstadter has shown that the Founders distrusted both a government too democratic and one too authoritarian. He perhaps best summarizes this sentiment with a quote from a clergyman named Jeremy Belknap: "Let it stand as a principal that government originates from the people; but let the people be taught...that they are not able to govern themselves."**

Yet, many of us look to those in authority for security, and as examples of moral integrity. There is, I suppose, a danger in both too much skepticism and too little. For one who tends to trust easily, one danger--the least of them-- lies in a stinging disappointment when he finds fault with the one in authority. Worse, such a man may tolerate gross abuses by this person. This rings true in both the private and public spheres.

I write this in response to my own feelings about authority. I, for one, am more apt to trust that people with power want to do the right thing. Yet, both Christian doctrine and my own experience have taught me that motives are not always pure. Athletes cheat. Politicians extort. Pastors commit adultery. It becomes easy to address such glaring flaws in human authority with a decision to keep a distance. Confine the ones in authority to their roles as leaders, scholars, and scientists. Make them heroes. Ignore their personal lives and, by all means, don't get close. With such a strategy in hand, there will be no need to worry yourself with moral flaws.

Such a perception, of course, cannot last. Whether the truth screams or whispers, it cannot be made mute forever; and the house of cards one builds to manage his own insecurities about the world will be dashed, sometimes violently, and often by the man himself. When this happens, a shift in faith often ensues. Faith in business becomes faith in athletes; faith in the church becomes faith in charitable organizations; faith in parents becomes faith in bosses. When, in its turn, this trust is violated, what comes next is a maturity of sorts, if a man allows it. In whatever new or old authority the man invests himself, it is in the clear understanding that it, too, will fail. The foundation, it must be decided at the start, cannot be left the same. No belief in authority can ultimately rest in man himself.

Jesus knew this. In Matthew 7, he communicated the gravity of our decisions about whom or what we trust, and shows that there is one who is trustworthy:
Everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.
Trust involves action. Consider a scene from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. In a cave containing the Holy Grail, Indy's father is shot. Knowing that the Grail can heal the sick, Indy enters the cave to retrieve it, and eventually approaches a cliff. His guidebook reads, "Only in the leap from the lion's head will he prove his worth." Thus, he is forced to step into the precipice, but when he does so, finds an invisible path there to catch him. His fears relieved, he then walks more confidently across the path. It was the first step that was the riskiest. Just to be safe, however, he threw pebbles across the path behind him so he could see where it was.

We do not always have that luxury. In fact, it is easy for us to forget how God has proven himself to us, so that the faith in God that once moved mountains is so reduced that we can barely get out of bed in the morning. This faith amnesia must be one reason that James exhorts us to continue obeying and following the word of God, “not forgetting what we have heard, but doing it.” Those who do this, James promises, “will be blessed in what they do.”

That there is an eternal Father in whom we can trust may come as unseemly to a nation increasingly unwilling to trust our institutions.*** Yet, this is the only permanent foundation on which we can build our trust, the only one that will not fail. Such trust, like all trust, comes at a cost, of course. We must be willing to obey the one in authority to see that he is trustworthy; once this happens, a man begins to see the firmness of his foundation. "All other ground"-- be it fame, money, achievement, or those in authority-- "is sinking sand."

*"Trust in Government." Gallup, Inc. September 2014. Web. 5 October 2014.
*On domestic problems, seventeen percent of people answered "None at all" for 2011, 2013, and 2014. On international problems, nineteen percent answered "None at all."
**Hofstadter, Richard. "The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism." The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. A.A. Knopf: New York, 1948. Quoted from Clark, Doug. Linn-Benton Community College. Web. October 2014.
***A 2012 Gallup poll ("U.S. Confidence in Organized Religion at Low Point") found that Americans have also lost trust in the church as an institution. While in 1973, 66 percent of respondents held "a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of trust in the church as an institution, only 44 percent said so in 2012.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Ghosts

Exercising at a gym seems to be pretty important in our culture, but it's kind of weird to see the social dynamics when you're there. Usually, if you're running an errand, you see others doing the same thing, going about their days and focusing on what's in front of them. The same thing happens at the gym, only everyone is relatively stationary. They don't really go anywhere, except from one machine or area to another. One might think this lends itself to lots of interaction between members, especially since they're all there for the same purpose, but it isn't true. Not only do people generally avoid talking to one another, but they also avoid even looking at one another. It is as though there is no one else there, even though there are dozens on any given day. Most people follow this unwritten rule, unless something in the environment-- say, two people wanting to use the same set of weights-- gives them common ground to interact, or unless they've alr...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...