Skip to main content

The Leap

In September of 2014, when Gallup asked a sample of Americans whether they trust the federal government to handle international and domestic problems, the number of people who marked "None at all" was at its highest point since May of 1972. Respondents even showed a decreasing tendency to trust themselves.* Such distrust goes back to this country's inception. Richard Hofstadter has shown that the Founders distrusted both a government too democratic and one too authoritarian. He perhaps best summarizes this sentiment with a quote from a clergyman named Jeremy Belknap: "Let it stand as a principal that government originates from the people; but let the people be taught...that they are not able to govern themselves."**

Yet, many of us look to those in authority for security, and as examples of moral integrity. There is, I suppose, a danger in both too much skepticism and too little. For one who tends to trust easily, one danger--the least of them-- lies in a stinging disappointment when he finds fault with the one in authority. Worse, such a man may tolerate gross abuses by this person. This rings true in both the private and public spheres.

I write this in response to my own feelings about authority. I, for one, am more apt to trust that people with power want to do the right thing. Yet, both Christian doctrine and my own experience have taught me that motives are not always pure. Athletes cheat. Politicians extort. Pastors commit adultery. It becomes easy to address such glaring flaws in human authority with a decision to keep a distance. Confine the ones in authority to their roles as leaders, scholars, and scientists. Make them heroes. Ignore their personal lives and, by all means, don't get close. With such a strategy in hand, there will be no need to worry yourself with moral flaws.

Such a perception, of course, cannot last. Whether the truth screams or whispers, it cannot be made mute forever; and the house of cards one builds to manage his own insecurities about the world will be dashed, sometimes violently, and often by the man himself. When this happens, a shift in faith often ensues. Faith in business becomes faith in athletes; faith in the church becomes faith in charitable organizations; faith in parents becomes faith in bosses. When, in its turn, this trust is violated, what comes next is a maturity of sorts, if a man allows it. In whatever new or old authority the man invests himself, it is in the clear understanding that it, too, will fail. The foundation, it must be decided at the start, cannot be left the same. No belief in authority can ultimately rest in man himself.

Jesus knew this. In Matthew 7, he communicated the gravity of our decisions about whom or what we trust, and shows that there is one who is trustworthy:
Everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.
Trust involves action. Consider a scene from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. In a cave containing the Holy Grail, Indy's father is shot. Knowing that the Grail can heal the sick, Indy enters the cave to retrieve it, and eventually approaches a cliff. His guidebook reads, "Only in the leap from the lion's head will he prove his worth." Thus, he is forced to step into the precipice, but when he does so, finds an invisible path there to catch him. His fears relieved, he then walks more confidently across the path. It was the first step that was the riskiest. Just to be safe, however, he threw pebbles across the path behind him so he could see where it was.

We do not always have that luxury. In fact, it is easy for us to forget how God has proven himself to us, so that the faith in God that once moved mountains is so reduced that we can barely get out of bed in the morning. This faith amnesia must be one reason that James exhorts us to continue obeying and following the word of God, “not forgetting what we have heard, but doing it.” Those who do this, James promises, “will be blessed in what they do.”

That there is an eternal Father in whom we can trust may come as unseemly to a nation increasingly unwilling to trust our institutions.*** Yet, this is the only permanent foundation on which we can build our trust, the only one that will not fail. Such trust, like all trust, comes at a cost, of course. We must be willing to obey the one in authority to see that he is trustworthy; once this happens, a man begins to see the firmness of his foundation. "All other ground"-- be it fame, money, achievement, or those in authority-- "is sinking sand."

*"Trust in Government." Gallup, Inc. September 2014. Web. 5 October 2014.
*On domestic problems, seventeen percent of people answered "None at all" for 2011, 2013, and 2014. On international problems, nineteen percent answered "None at all."
**Hofstadter, Richard. "The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism." The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. A.A. Knopf: New York, 1948. Quoted from Clark, Doug. Linn-Benton Community College. Web. October 2014.
***A 2012 Gallup poll ("U.S. Confidence in Organized Religion at Low Point") found that Americans have also lost trust in the church as an institution. While in 1973, 66 percent of respondents held "a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of trust in the church as an institution, only 44 percent said so in 2012.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Persuasion

At different points in history, governments have devoted men, women, and resources to try to persuade others to their side. One significant example of this occurred in Germany under Adolf Hitler. Hitler knew how important it was to make sure the German people were on his side as leader of the country. One way he did this was by controlling what people heard. Specifically, near the beginning of World War II, Hitler made it a crime for anyone in Germany to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. These were called the “extraordinary radio measures.” He did this to ensure that Germans weren’t being persuaded by enemy countries to question their loyalty to Hitler. He knew that a German listening to a radio broadcast from Britain might persuade that German to believe that Great Britain was the good guy and Hitler the bad guy. This was so important, in fact, that two people in Germany were actually executed because they had either listened to or planned to listen to a foreign radio broadcast (one...

Experiment

My social studies students and I are studying Islam right now. The other day, we were reading about one of the Five Pillars, zakat (charity in Islam that means "that which purifies"). Muslims believe that giving away money helps to purify it and also "safeguards [them] against miserliness" (1). I asked the class if this was true, that giving money away makes us less greedy. They generally agreed that it does. I wanted to test whether or not they really believed this, so I handed a volunteer a $10 bill. I told the class that I would ask for the bill back the next day. I said that they should pass the bill around among their classmates, and that as a result, there would be no way for me to know who had the bill. For that reason, whoever wanted to keep the money could keep it. Even if I did learn who kept it, I told them, I would not punish that person. I wanted them to be motivated by their own honesty. The next day, I asked for the bill, and a student handed it to me...