Skip to main content

Language as Power

Here in California, we use the terms "hecka" and "hella," and apparently in the Northeast, it is not uncommon to hear someone say that a situation is "wicked." In Washington, D.C., you might hear of a "slug," a driver in need of a passenger to drive in the carpool lane.* These are examples of regional colloquialisms, words common to a specific region of a nation. While some of these are still in use today (I hear "putz around," for example, indicating the act of doing nothing in particular), we no longer use many others.

Just as words fall out of use, however, new colloquialisms are formed. The Internet, I am certain, increases not only the speed at which new uses of words spread, but also the expansion of these words' use from a specific region to the entire nation, something an NPR author calls homogenization.* Two recent examples come from the political and entertainment spheres.

In the former case, Jeb Bush and journalists, at least, have begun to use--and so attach new, now emotionally loaded, meaning to--the term "hypotheticals," a word now used to describe unwanted questions that offer no benefit to the real world and used to catch politicians in taking unfavorable political positions. Amid questions about whether he would have invaded Iraq as his brother chose to do, Bush stated, "Going back in time and talking about hypotheticals--what would have happened, what could have happened--I think, does a disservice for [U.S. soldiers who invaded Iraq]. What we ought to be focusing on is what are the lessons learned."**

In the same way, one movie reviewer used the term "bloated" to describe the new Avengers: Age of Ultron film, implying the movie was too full of meaningful dialogue and action to follow comfortably.

If nothing else, such use of old words in new ways contributes to the shifting nature of language. As an example, consider that the term "selfie" only recently came into use. Interestingly, words--like clothing, hobbies, and other aspects of culture--can also be used to unite or divide a group. This is just as true in the professional world as it is in informal communication. A professional who knows the jargon of his or her business may be more accepted--if subconsciously--than one who does not; while someone who uses the language common to his or her peers in an informal setting may acquire the same acceptance. It is a mark of social intelligence to understand and use these words in their proper contexts, or else a sign that one is foreign to the culture he or she has entered.

This is not intended as an indictment of those who exclude others, but an expansion of something I remember learning about for the first time in a college teacher education class. In that setting, we learned that part of our job as teachers is to teach students the language of the professional, formal world to allow them access to success in life (or, perhaps that is how I understood the teacher's meaning when he taught us this notion of formal and informal language), while also honoring their own use of language. Perhaps this political use of language as a means for inclusion and exclusion is why Quebec has in the past been fervent in maintaining French as part of Canada's recognized languages. Language can be an expression of power.

*Weeks, Linton. "Do We Talk Funny? 51 American Colloqualisms." NPR. 12 May 2015. Web. 23 May 2015.
**Falcone, Michael. "Jeb Bush Suggests Asking 'Hypothetical' Questions About Iraq 'Does a Disservice' to Dead American Soldiers." ABC News. 13 May 2015. Web. 23 May 2015.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...