Skip to main content

Chess

I don't blame you if you think me strange for the following behavior, but I was really in the mood to play chess when I surmised the following idea.

In fact, it was more of a small experiment. I printed a sign that read "Want to play chess?" and then went with my newly-purchased chess set to a book store nearby. I bought coffee in the cafe of the store, then sat at a fairly visible table. I then set up my sign under my chess board so it could be seen by anyone who happened to look, and then started reading a book I brought. I guessed that it would be too socially risky to approach a stranger to play chess, even if there is a sign inviting anyone to play, but I hoped I was wrong. Without looking too conspicuous, I glanced to see if anyone was interested. There wasn't. I saw one man hesitate to sit down when he saw the sign, but then he sat two tables away. Whether no one was truly interested-- which is what I felt happened-- or no one wanted to take the risk to play chess with a stranger, I can't say. For my part, I feel I shouldn't have been nervous to do something like this, something that isn't horribly risky; but I was a little nervous. I wanted to challenge myself a little, and at the same time, I wanted to be social. I want to try this again at some point, if for nothing else, than to watch for others' responses. Who knows? I might eventually get someone to play.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as