Skip to main content

Decision Points

Decision PointsDecision Points by George W. Bush


In Decision Points, George W. Bush reflects on the most consequential choices he made in his eight years in office, declaring some to be good decisions and others to be poor ones. In his discussion, the reader gains insight into his decision-making process, learning that values were foremost in his mind. Where his values conflicted with the urgency of a situation, Bush showed--such as with his decision to invest taxpayer money to sustain the insurance, banking, and auto industries--that he was willing to adopt behaviors that opposed his values, but that ultimately helped the country. If you are interested in a history of the political events surrounding the United States in the first decade of the twenty-first century, this offers an overview of those events from the perspective of the White House. If you are interested in learning about George W. Bush as a person, this book is also helpful: while Bush focuses almost exclusively on politics, he does describe important personal life events, especially with regard to family. In the end, Decision Points helps the reader understand the mindset of a man compelled to make decisions about science and the nature of human life; war and defense; the economic direction of the country; and more. On a personal note, I noticed the extent to which the country differs now compared to even ten years ago, especially with regard to the salient divisions on race, when in Bush's presidency those divisions focused more acutely on Iraq. As a Bush supporter, I recommend this book as a way to learn about the person himself, and I would recommend it for those who are interested in a president's perspective on the issues of the day that he faced. In reading this, you get the impression of a man of strong convictions, as well as one willing to listen to a wide variety of perspectives on issues. I personally found the president to be more centrist and pragmatic than I had first believed, particularly on immigration, but also one who never forfeit his values.


View all my reviews

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Savior

This wasteland cold and dark runs free Its fearful creatures speak to me One fateful day one nudged my hand To set my eyes upon a tree He knew I could not understand For I was in his native land His signs became our common speech To lead me through the deadly sand Now stuck I saw him me beseech He could not lift me out to reach The firm foundation of a cave Outside the boundaries of this beach Withal, the beast became more brave To risk his own my life to save To carry me, its life it gave To carry me, its life it gave. This poem was inspired by Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening." That poem, like this one, has four four-line stanzas of eight syllables per stanza. Its rhyme scheme is AABA BBCB CCDC DDDD.

Soul and Spirit

As a friend told me about a conversation she had with one of our pastors about whether animals go to heaven, she told me about the Hebrew word nephesh ("soul"). I wondered, then, what the difference was between soul and spirit. After a little research, I came across what many seem to agree is a main difference. The soul of a person is that person's being--personality and life--while the spirit is that part of us that connects with God. There are several verses that refer to spirit in this way:* "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14) "But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ." (1 Corinthians 3:1) "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly p...

Evil, According to Republicans and Democrats

Please note that the following thoughts are only my observations. Please consider the evidence you see in the behavior of both parties for yourself. In our politically polarized climate, I was thinking about how Democrats and Republicans are different, and where those differences come from. Democrats seem to place more hope in institutions, and seek to reform those institutions when there is something wrong in society. Hence, there is more willingness to levy taxes to offer more social services as a support to those with less than others. They see the state as a way to equalize society. Thus, evil, to Democrats, seems to be a social issue: if there is a problem in society--poverty, racism, climate change, etc.--it is a problem with the structure of society and must be addressed as such: repair the system, and you will solve the problem. They are generally accepting of a larger state bureaucracy because they believe that increased accountability within a state structure will prevent evi...