Skip to main content

Free Will and God's Sovereignty (Molinism)

Like other Christians, I've wondered how it could be true that God both directs the course of history and gives humans the freedom to make their own choices. More specifically, I asked the common question, "Do we choose salvation, or does God choose it for us?" Calvinists in the Reformation argued that God determined, or predestined, who would be saved and who would not be saved, but like many others, this led to what I thought of as an unjust God because it meant he condemned some and saved others. Putting aside for the moment this false assumption of God's possible injustice-- indeed, none of us deserves salvation, and God's choosing salvation for anyone is a grace those saved didn't deserve-- what I ultimately wondered about was God's sovereignty versus our free will.

In my late teenage years, I thought I had solved the problem easily with a single verse: Romans 8:29, which reads, "For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters." I thought this made it clear that God knew who would choose him and who would reject him, so that he simply determined that those who would choose him had the opportunity to do so, so that they would in fact become Christians. This allowed me to believe our free will operated within God's sovereignty. God knows Person A would not choose him, and so he makes it impossible for that person to choose him; while he also knows Person B would choose him, and makes it impossible for that person not to choose him.

What I did not realize was that this Scripture is referring not to who would be saved and who would be condemned, but to Christians who are already saved being made in the likeness of Christ. Paul speaks not of salvation, but of sanctification. He foreknew who would be conformed, or made like, Christ. Paul is showing these believers that God sends his Spirit to help us in our weakness (Romans 8:26)-- a Spirit who intercedes for his followers (Romans 8:27)-- works for their good (Romans 8:28), and conforms them to Christ (Romans 8:29) (1)

A few years ago, I was introduced to molinism, a doctrine by a Catholic in the counter-Reformation named Luis Molina, who argued that God knew exactly what each person would do in each set of circumstances. William Lane Craig cites Acts 4:27-28 in an article titled "Arminian and Molinist Accounts of Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom:"(2)

"for truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand and your plan had predestined to take place."

Here, God, Craig points out, put two specific people in place--Herod and Pilate--to do his will. He acted in a very specific way on human history. Molinism, Craig shows, means that God knew that Herod and Pilate would have made this choice,whereas another two people would have freed Jesus. Therefore, God placed Herod and Pilate in those circumstances so that his will would be done. God retained his sovereignty, while Herod and Pilate (who would have freely made that choice in those conditions) retained their free will. In the same way, God knows that you or I would do in a situation, and may have placed us in that situation so that we freely choose what God intended. (3)

This is the extent of my understanding of how free will and God's sovereignty can coexist, and therefore is just the beginning. In short, it's a start.

1. I am influenced here by the following sources:
*"Romans 8:29-30." Free Will and Predestination. Wordpress. Web. 25 May 2020. https://freewillpredestination.wordpress.com/romans-829-30/

*Boyd, Greg. "How Do You Respond to Romans 8:29-30?" ReKnew. 17 January 2008. Web. 25 May 2020. https://reknew.org/2008/01/what-about-romans-829-30/

*"What Does Romans 8:29 Mean?" BibleRef. GotQuestions.org. Web. 25 May 2020. https://www.bibleref.com/Romans/8/Romans-8-29.html

*Tonydisciple. "Romans 8:29-30 Refuting Calvinism." ChristianChat. Christian Chat. 18 July 2012. Web. 25 May 2020. https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/romans-8-29-30-refuting-calvanism-free-will.44992/

2. Craig, William Lane. "What is Molinism?" drcraigvideos. YouTube. 6 December 2019. Web. 25 May 2020.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IurPYaB0JGs

3. Craig, William Lane. "Doctrine of Creation (Part 12): Arminian and Molinist Accounts of Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom." Reasonable Faith. Reasonable Faith. 22 August 2018. Web. 25 May 2020. https://www.reasonablefaith.org/podcasts/defenders-podcast-series-3/s3-doctrine-of-creation/doctrine-of-creation-part-12

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...
2 comments
Read more