Skip to main content

Pleasure

*Note: In the following post, I am heavily influenced by a pastor named Bob Shirock. Specifically, Shirock writes about Solomon's response to the pleasures he experienced in life in Ecclesiastes, and observes that we can enjoy pleasures in life if we accept them as God's gifts, and if we express our gratitude in their enjoyment. He cites Ecclesiastes 2:24-26 and 1 Timothy 4:1-5.


I’ve noticed something about pleasure: the highs can be followed by lows. This sounds obvious, but what I mean is that times of joy and fun in life's pleasures are wonderful, and can lift your spirits for a time, but they can be followed by a disappointment that comes from the realization that they are short-lived and will not satisfy us in the long-term.

I’m calling this a pleasure hangover. We gain happiness for a time, but see that this happiness is temporary. We therefore feel a subsequent low that leaves us still longing. It reminds me of a theme in the life of C.S. Lewis: sehnsucht, or a wistful longing for something more. He speaks of this in his secular literature, as well as his talks-turned-book titled Mere Christianity, his book The Weight of Glory, and in The Chronicles of Narnia. In the past, during a season of depression, this longing made me wonder what the use was for any pleasure if pleasures couldn’t satisfy us. I believed that if pleasure wasn't something that came to us easily, perhaps it could be earned. I felt, then, that the only way to find pleasure was to discipline myself to feel good enough to earn it. Really, though, I was still depending on pleasure as my goal. I had put my hope in it by seeing it as the end result of a life lived to earn it. The result was catastrophic: not only did I reject pleasures, but I also rejected needs, including relationships. It only worsened my depression. I didn’t realize at the time that Scripture helps in addressing this, what I now know is a false mindset. Read 1 Timothy 6:17-18:

“Command those who are rich in this present world not to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share.”

Paul doesn't say to reject wealth, which he rightly says is uncertain, but to put your hope in God. The next part of the sentence shows that we don't have to reject pleasure. Indeed, God gives pleasures to us "for our enjoyment." Instead of being the ultimate goal, however, they are understood as gifts from God.*

Read, too, Colossians 3:1-4. Paul had just finished writing that human regulations are powerless to restrain sensual-indulgence (a form of pleasure). His solution was different:

“Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things. For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God. When Christ, who is your life, appears, you also will appear with him in glory.”

While we cannot find ultimate fulfillment in this life, we can anticipate heaven and the glory of God in all his goodness. With that in mind, the pleasures of this world are but a reminder of something more that will be our ultimate pleasure. When understood in that way, we will neither reject those pleasures nor depend on them for our fulfillment. Rather, we can receive them with gratitude as a gift. Such an attitude, experiencing pleasures as God’s gifts, and maintaining a gratitude for them, will not destroy our longing, but emphasize the hope we have that it will one day be satisfied in Christ.

*Again, this idea of the enjoyment of pleasure as a gift from God comes from Bob Shirock.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as
2 comments
Read more