Skip to main content

End of an Era

It was over two years ago that I joined an experiment that would last until last July, an experiment that would significantly change me and the eleven others involved. That experiment was the creation of a new church comprised of twelve members whose purpose was to serve the people of downtown Stockton. Most attractive to me about it was that half of our income would be used in some way outside the church, to benefit the local community or to aid in international assistance.

In that span of time, we did in fact serve in ways we'd envisioned. One of our first events was a pizza and school supplies giveaway (coupled with games for the kids who came) toward the end of our first summer. Many of those who came seemed genuinely happy at this. Through that year, we also hosted an event called a "card me house party," wherein each person's ticket to the event was a gift card. Once inside, chips could be purchased to play card and other games, with the resulting collection going to a local child abuse shelter and an international relief organization. We later took part in something further, called "Tom's Shoes," where we purchased blank white shoes from a company (Tom's Shoes) that gives much of the proceeds away to charity. We then recruited church members and other volunteers to offer foot massages to women from a local women's shelter, along with the free shoes, which they could decorate as they wanted.

That next summer, we repeated the pizza and school supplies giveaway, but perhaps the most visible outreach of our church came-- tragically-- toward the end of the church's life: a community garden. One of our members had it on her heart to organize a garden in the parking lot of the self-same child abuse prevention shelter that we'd donated to through the card me house party (a plot of grass covers about one-fourth of the lot). We built the garden beds and the irrigation system, then planted fruits and vegetables, all with the intention that local families would be able to cultivate their own food in subdivided plots.

These were only the larger events, but we also contributed to Kiva, a microloan organization that helps families in various countries start up businesses and then repay their loans; we sponsored a child through World Vision; and donated funds to that non-profit as well, among other things.

When the church dissolved, I suppose I would have believed church life would have returned to the way that it was before I joined, but it was (and is) not to be. The church we were was small, and forced us-- especially at the beginning-- to depend on one another, since we had come from a church that was rich in community. That alone reshaped the perspective that at least some of us had about what a church truly is. In my previous church, I'd led or co-led studies, but I'd never felt that my absence would be so noticed as it would be in this new church. Small emotional ripples in one person-- whether that was joy, frustration, or something else- could be felt as waves in the group. As a result, there was no hiding here. You were who you were, and everyone could see it. Such closeness would lead us to an interdependence that I'd never experienced. Equally important, if less obvious, was our spiritual maturity. Because the weight of this experiment fell on only a few shoulders, each of us was also challenged to grow in leadership or other areas as we met through the weeks. We became leaders in our own ways, and happily, God seemed fully part of the process: we were praying together, our hearts seemed to want the things he does (worshiping him with generous lives), and we were unified.

Alas, things began to fall apart in 2011. What began as a corporate lack of direction ended with fatigue and disillusionment. For the most part, the church's end was a velvet divorce, but it was a divorce nonetheless; and it exhibited some of the qualities that divorces do: there were a few hurt feelings, and there were-- and continue to be-- dying relationships (although most are friendly dying relationships). I hold to my firm belief, however, that "God works for the good of those who love him," and know that he can take events like these and use them to build something more beautiful than we ever could have constructed alone (Genesis 50:20 comes to mind).

We are different, but different in a good way. I wouldn't take back this experience if given the choice. I made good friends and had the privilege of being involved in a wonderful purpose whose intent was to honor God and to benefit the people around us.

Comments

  1. Aw Tony, this is just beautiful:

    "God works for the good of those who love him," and know that he can take events like these and use them to build something more beautiful than we ever could have constructed alone.

    We really did do some amazing things, with God's help.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to