Skip to main content

Eugenics

Occurring in the early twentieth-century United States was a movement that had its source in social Darwinism, known as eugenics. Men like the nineteenth-century Darwinist Herbert Spencer believed medicine and charity had unnaturally protected the unfit of society, implying that we should allow nature to take its course and root out the weak. Going a step further, eugenicists asserted that it was necessary to assist nature in this task. The aim of eugenics advocates was to improve human heredity through social measures, and was therefore a mix of utilitarian and evolutionary principles. The result in the United States was, among other things, forced sterilization laws for the handicapped, the insane, and criminals, as well as marriage restriction and anti-immigration laws (1). Given the substantial changes taking place in progressive America, then, along with the promotion of eugenic ideas, it should not be surprising to find that a movement to prevent suicide could coexist with efforts to legalize the killing of “idiots,” criminals, and other defectives (2).

Go back much farther and you find that eugenics is not such a new issue. In his Republic, Plato, too, believed that a government should shape the nature of a society by controlling who married whom. Consider his words:
"Why, I said, the principle has been already laid down that the best of either sex should be united with the best as often, and the inferior with the inferior, as seldom as possible; and that they should rear the offspring of the one sort of union, but not of the other, if the flock is to be maintained in first-rate condition. Now these goings on must be secret which the rulers only know, or there will be a further danger of our herd, as the guardians may be termed, breaking out into rebellion."
How would this take place? Plato thought the rulers could organize festivals in which unmarried people would take part in marriage lots contrived to ensure that the "best" would end up with those like them, "and then they will accuse their own ill-luck and not the rulers (3).

Equally interesting is that Plato agreed with Socrates that it was necessary to deceive the people into believing in "the myth of the metals." According to this myth, each person's soul had mixed within it a specific type of metal: gold, silver, bronze, or iron. The gold-souled people were meant to rule, the silver souls meant to be soldiers, and the bronze- or iron-souled people meant to be producers. It was necessary to observe children to determine the group to which they belonged.

Eugenics in the United States lost popularity with its promotion in Nazi Germany, but it is still shocking to us to hear words from our leaders who promoted it. Listen to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell which allowed forced sterilization in the United States:
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough"(4).

1. Martin S. Pernick, The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of Defective Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures Since 1915, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 22; Ian Dowbiggin, A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 14-15; Stephen L.Kuepper, “Euthanasia in America, 1890-1960: The Controversy, the Movement, and the Law,” PhD diss., (New Jersey: Rutgers: 1981), 62.
2. Kuepper, 27; Pernick, 24.
3. Plato. The Republic, Book V. Produced by Sue Asscher and David Widger. Web. 20 February 2012.
4. "The Sterilization of America: A Cautionary History." The Center for Individual Freedom. 17 May 2002. Web. 20 February 2012.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Heroes

Although we have several examples of heroes in our day, one of the best known is of a woman named Agnes Gonxhe Bojaxhiu (“Gonja Bojaju”), who devoted her life to sustaining the “poor, sick, orphaned, and dying.” Her venue was Calcutta, India, where she served as a teacher until she began to take notice of the poverty there. Seeking to do something about it, she began an organization that consisted of just thirteen members at its inception. Called the “Missionaries of Charity,” the organization would eventually burgeon into well over 5,000 members worldwide, running approximately 600 missions, schools and shelters in 120 countries; and caring for the orphaned, blind, aged, disabled, and poor. As her personal work expanded, she traveled to countries like Lebanon, where she rescued 37 children from a hospital by pressing for peace between Israel and Palestine; to Ethiopia, where she traveled to help the hungry; to Chernobyl, Russia, to assist victims of the nuclear meltdown there; and to ...
2 comments
Read more

The Nice Guy Fallacy

I read part of a poem recently by one of my favorite poets. It reads: I envy not in any moods The captive void of noble rage The linnet born within the cage That never knew the summer woods. I envy not the beast that takes His license in the field of time Unfetter'd by the sense of crime To whom a conscience never wakes. Nor what may call itself as bles't The heart that never plighted troth But stagnates in the weeds of sloth Nor any want-begotten rest. I hold it true, whate'er befall I feel it, when I sorrow most 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. At base, Tennyson contrasted a life of risk, and consequent pain, with one of security. He sides conclusively with the life of risk, and says he fails to envy those who have faced no hardship. I agree with him; and, for good or ill, his words are just as relevant today as they were in the nineteenth century. Like then, there are those today who choose to live their lives with as little risk as...
2 comments
Read more

Comparative Medical Care

One thing I'd like to understand is why there is such a difference between medical costs here and those in Haiti. At the time the book Mountains Beyond Mountains was written, in 2003, it often cost $15,000 to $20,000 annually to treat a patient with tuberculosis, while it cost one one-hundredth of that-- $150 to $200-- to treat a patient for the disease in Haiti. Even if the figures aren't completely accurate, the sheer difference would still be there. Indeed, the United States pays more per capita for medical care than any other country on Earth. My first guess for why the disparity exists is that there is a market willing and able to pay more for medical treatment, so suppliers see the demand and respond with higher prices. According to at least one doctor (go to http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2009/05/what_is_the_cause_of_excess_co.php), part of the reason is administrative prices here. People here have a higher standard of living, and so the cost of care is shifted to ...
2 comments
Read more